Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Hemant Soren, son of Shibu Soren – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. This Court, before proceeding to pass order on merit deems, it fit and proper to refer herein the order passed by this Court on 26th February, 2024, which reads as under:
2. It has been submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that the defect, as pointed out by the office, has already been removed.
3. Mr. Amit Kumar, Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-E.D. has sought for leave of this Court to file counter affidavit in the Court. It has been submitted that the copy of the same has been served upon Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner.
4. Let it be taken on record.
5. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not require to file any response to the counter affidavit.
6. One supplementary affidavit has also been filed, which has been prayed to be taken on record. The copy of the same has been served upon Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-E.D.
7. Let it be taken on record.
8. Learned senior counsel for the respondent also does not require time to file any response.
9. The
The court established that the right to participate in legislative proceedings is not a fundamental right and can be restricted in cases of valid detention, particularly when serious allegations are ....
Point of law: Election – Disqualification - No perversity - Speaker passed the impugned disqualification order after taking into consideration all the pleadings, newspaper reports, the photographs an....
The power of suspension of legislative members extends beyond Assembly grounds, and procedural adherence to natural justice does not nullify Assembly decisions unless serious prejudice exists.
The court emphasized the need for a graded approach in the suspension of members from the legislative assembly, highlighting that such action should be necessary for the orderly conduct of the House'....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prohibition against the exercise of the right to vote under Sec. 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 applies to the electi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in matters concerning the internal functioning of the State Legislature. The court emphasized that the High Co....
The right to contest elections is a statutory right, not a fundamental right, allowing restrictions based on criminal background to protect electoral integrity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
