SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjiv Khanna, Dipankar Datta, JJ.
Lalit Chaturvedi & Others – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh & Another – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 660 of 2023 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 13485 of 2023)
Decided On : 06-02-2024
(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Exercise of inherent power – Section 482 of Cr.P.C. saves inherent power of High Court as it serves a salutary purpose viz. a person should not undergo harassment of litigation for a number of years when no criminal offence is made out – It is one thing to say that a case has been made out for trial and criminal proceedings should not be quashed, but another thing to say that a person must undergo a criminal trial despite the fact that no offence has been made out in complaint. (Para 5)
(B) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 406 and 506 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Criminal breach of trust and criminal intimidation – There is clear distinction between a civil wrong in form of breach of contract, non-payment of money or disregard to and violation of contractual terms and a criminal offence under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC – Complainant’s grievance is regarding failure of appellants to pay outstanding amount, in spite of repeated demands – Appellants had made payments from time to time leaving some balance – Assuming that assertions made in complaint are correct but even then criminal offence under Section 420 read with Section 415 of IPC is not established in absence of deception by making false and misleading representation, dishonest concealment or any other act or omission, or inducement of complainant to deliver any property at the time of contract(s) being entered – Ingredients to allege offence are neither stated nor can be inferred from averments – Prayer is made to police for recovery of money from appellants – Police is to investigate allegations which discloses a criminal act – Police does not have power and authority to recover money or act as a civil court for recovery of money – Charge-sheet also refers to Section 406 of IPC, but no details and particulars are mentioned – For offence of cheating, dishonest intention must exist at inception of transaction, whereas, in case of criminal breach of trust there must exist a relationship between parties whereby one party entrusts another with property as per law – In this case entrustment is missing – It is a case of sale of goods – Charge-sheet does refer to Section 506 of IPC relying upon averments in complaint – However, no details and particulars are given – Allegations of threats etc. have been made only with intent to activate police machinery for recovery of money – Initiation of criminal process for oblique purposes, is bad in law and amounts to abuse of process of law – It is for complainant to file civil suit – Impugned judgment set aside and FIR and resultant proceedings, including charge-sheet quashed – Appeal allowed. (Paras 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10)
Facts of the case:
FIR for offence(s) punishable under Sections 406 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered vide the complaint made by Sanjay Garg, who is respondent no. 2 in present appeal. Impugned judgment dismisses application filed by appellants under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. on the ground of delay/laches and also the factum that charge-sheet had been filed on 12.12.2019.
Findings of Court:
This Court, in a number of judgments, has pointed out clear distinction between a civil wrong in form of breach of contract, non-payment of money or disregard to and violation of contractual terms; and a criminal offence under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC. Repeated judgments of this Court, however, are somehow overlooked, and are not being applied and enforced.
Result : Appeal allowed. FIR quashed.
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. First Information Report1[For short “FIR”.]No. 287/2019 for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 18602[For short “IPC”.]] was registered on 30.08.2019 with Police Station – Hapur Dehat, District – Hapur, Uttar Pradesh vide the complaint made by Sanjay Garg, who is respondent no. 2 in the present appeal. The relevant portion of the complaint, as converted into the FIR, reads as under:-
4. After the investigation, the police has filed the charge sheet under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19733[For short “Cr.P.C.”.], which verbatim reproduces the complaint and, thereupon, refers to the fact that the appellants, namely, Lalit Chaturvedi, Mukesh Sharma and Manoj Chaturvedi have approached the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and obtained an order granting stay of arrest. Thereafter, it is recorded as under : -
Mohammed Ibrahim and Others v. State of Bihar and Another
V.Y. Jose and Another v. State of Gujarat and Another
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati v. CBI
Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd.
Vir Prakash Sharma v. Anil Kumar Agarwal
All Cargo Movers (I) (P) Ltd. v. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain
Wolfgang Reim and Others v. State and Another
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. and Another v. Delta Classic (P.) Ltd.
Criminal breach of trust and criminal intimidation – There is clear distinction between a civil wrong in form of breach of contract, non-payment of money or disregard to and violation of contractual ....
Mere breach of contract without initial fraudulent intent does not constitute an offence under IPC sections 406 or 420.
The court reiterated that a mere breach of contract does not constitute a criminal offence unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is established, quashing the FIR due to lack of supporting evidence....
The allegations in the FIR do not constitute an offence under IPC Sections 406 and 420, as they lack essential elements of criminal intent, reflecting a civil dispute instead.
The mere failure to pay for goods in a commercial transaction does not constitute criminal breach of trust or cheating under IPC without evidence of dishonest intention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.