SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 966

B. R. GAVAI, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Suhas Chakma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Yes, arrested persons are entitled to early access to legal assistance to oppose remand applications and mount a defense against allegations, as this forms a critical component of ensuring fair treatment from the pre-arrest, arrest, and remand stages. (!) (!) (!)

This right is operationalized through a structured framework for pre-litigation assistance, where District Legal Services Authorities (DLSAs) must promptly depute lawyers upon receiving intimation of a request from the suspect or arrestee during interrogation at the police station. (!) Assigned legal aid lawyers are tasked with specific duties, including challenging arrests that violate statutory safeguards, expeditiously filing bail applications to oppose remand, keeping the client informed of case status, and seeking modifications to onerous bail conditions (such as excessive sureties) that could undermine the purpose of release. (!) (!) (!)

Legal Services Authorities at all levels are directed to diligently pursue and periodically review this framework to ensure its effective implementation, bridging gaps in awareness and access for indigent persons. (!) (!) Statistics demonstrate substantial utilization, with thousands of suspects receiving assistance at police stations pre-court production and during remand hearings, resulting in numerous bail grants. (!) This mechanism upholds the constitutional mandate that no one is denied justice due to economic or other disabilities, extending proactive support even before formal proceedings commence. (!) (!) (!)


JUDGMENT

K.V. Viswanathan, J.

Brief Facts:

1. The present Writ Petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, was filed primarily for issuance an appropriate Writ, Order or direction directing the respondents Union of India, States and the Union Territories to ensure that no prisoner is subjected to torture, cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment or punishment because of living in overcrowded and unhygienic conditions in jail. It also espouses the cause that all persons deprived of their liberty are entitled to be treated with humanity, and with respect for the inherent dignity and a prayer was made for creating a permanent mechanism to decongest the overcrowded prisons.

2. When the Writ Petition came up for hearing on 22.04.2024, this Court appointed Shri Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae. Thereafter, on 09.05.2024, Shri K. Parameshwar, learned Senior Advocate (as Amicus Curiae) and Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, learned counsel for the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) were requested to assist the Court alongside the already appointed Amicus Curiae. On that day Shri Vijay Hansaria, learned Amicus Curiae tendered to Court the format of a letter to be

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top