B. R. GAVAI, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Nabha Power Limited – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Power Coroporation Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.V. Viswanathan, J.
1. The present appeal arises from the judgment dated 30.06.2014 of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (for short the “APTEL”) in Appeal No. 29 of 2013. By the said judgement, the APTEL dismissed the appeal of the appellant and confirmed the order dated 12.11.2012 of the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short the “State Commission”), insofar as issue no. 1 discussed therein was concerned. That issue concerned the aspect of Mega Power Policy and the effect of the Press Release of 01.10.2009. We are only concerned with the said issue in this Appeal.
FACTS OF THE CASE: -
A) Customs Notification No. 21/2002 dated 01.03.2002.
2. To appreciate the issues involved, certain background facts need to be set out. Goods imported for setting up a Mega Power Project had, under a notification issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act dated 01.03.2002, been granted certain exemptions from customs duty. It will be useful to set out the relevant part of the 01.03.2002 notification.
Babu Verghese and Others vs. Bar Council of Kerala and Others
Nabha Power Limited (NPL) vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) and Another
Adani Power (Mundra) Limited vs. Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others
B.K. Srinivasan and Others vs. State of Karnataka and Others
GMR Warora Energy Limited vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission [CERC] and Others
Energy Watchdog vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others
Lloyd Electric and Engineering Limited vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Another vs. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another
Burn Standard Company Limited Vs. McDermott International INC and Anr.
(1) Interpretation of Contract – Business Efficacy Test – Any invocation of business efficacy test would arise only if terms of contract are not explicit and clear – Business Efficacy Test cannot con....
Section 3(B)(b) of Act enables levy of electricity duty upon cancellation of exemption.
Definition of “Law” is wide enough to include all rules, regulations, orders, notifications by Governmental instrumentalities.
Any change resulting in a cost impact on selling electricity constitutes a Change in Law event, entitling affected parties to compensation under PPAs.
Expert bodies' decisions should not be interfered with unless they violate statutory provisions or are arbitrary.
The term “Law” in the PPAs would include all applicable rules, regulations, orders, Notifications issued by an Indian Governmental Instrumentality and shall also include all rules, regulations, decis....
Tariff determination for hydro projects with enhanced capacity, binding nature of prior PPAs on successors, and writ jurisdiction limited; exclusive domain of regulatory commission, not courts, to fi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.