SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 465

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Pankaj Mithal, S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ.
Chote Bhai - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. . ...639 OF 2025 (@ SLP (CRL.) NO. 9632/2024)
Decided On : 10-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajul Shrivastav, Adv., Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR, Mr. Anubhav Sharma, Adv., Ms. Nayan Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. D.S. Parmar, A.A.G., Mr. Abhimanyu Singh GA, Adv., Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR, Mr. Saurabh Singh, Adv., Mr. Deepak Raj, Adv.

The court suspended the appellant's sentence and granted bail due to the lengthy delay in appeal proceedings and the time already served.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 307/149 - Conviction for attempted murder - Appellant sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment and fine - Appeal pending in High Court since 2022, with delays expected in hearing - Six co-accused granted suspension of sentence and bail - Appellant has served over three years of actual sentence. (Paras 3, 4, 5)

(B) Bail - Suspension of sentence - In light of the lengthy delay in appeal proceedings and the time already served by the appellant, the court finds it appropriate to suspend the sentence and grant bail. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted under Section 307/149 IPC and sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. The appeal is pending in the High Court, and the appellant has already served over three years.

Findings of Court:
The court decided to suspend the appellant's sentence and grant bail due to the lengthy delay in the appeal process and the time already served.

Issues: The main issue was whether to suspend the sentence of the appellant pending appeal, considering the time served and the delay in the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the circumstances, including the lengthy delay in appeal and the time already served, it was appropriate to suspend the sentence and grant bail.

Result: Appeal allowed.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The appellant has been convicted for commission of an offence under Section 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and has been sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment and fine.

4. The appeal of the appellant is pending consideration before the High Court. The appeal is of the year 2022 and in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, such appeals are not likely to be taken up in near future. It will take sufficient long time before the appeals are finally heard and decided.

5. Six out of seven accused have been granted the benefit of suspension of sentence and have been directed to be released on bail, pending the appeal(s). The appellant has already undergone over three years of actual sentence.

6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we consider it appropriate to suspend the sentence of the appellant and release him on bail, pending the appeal before the High Court.

7. Accordingly, we suspend the sentence of the appellant and direct to release him on bail subject to such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the trial Court.

8. The appeal is allowed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top