B. R. GAVAI, S. V. N. BHATTI
Godrej Projects Development Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anil Karlekar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, J.
1. The present appeal takes exception to the final judgment and order dated 25th October, 2022 passed in Consumer Complaint No. 262 of 2018, whereby the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter, “NCDRC”) disposed of the Consumer Complaint filed by the Respondents No. 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as, “Complainants” or “Respondents”) thereby directing the Appellant to deduct only 10% of the Basic Sale Price (“BSP” for short) towards cancellation of the Complainants’ Apartment and refund the balance amount along with simple interest @ 6% per annum from the date of each payment till the date of refund. Aggrieved thereby, the present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
2. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as given below.
2.1 On 10th January, 2014 the Complainants had booked an Apartment with the Appellant in the project by the name “Godrej Summit” situated at Sector 104, Gurgaon, Haryana by an Application Form and submitted Rs. 10,00,000/- as application money.
2.2 On 20th June, 2014 by an allotment letter, the Appellant allotted an Apartment being Apartment No. C-1501 on the 14th
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited v. Govindan Raghavan
Desh Raj and others v. Rohtash Singh
Ireo Grace Realtech Private Limited v. Abhishek Khanna and others
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and Another v. Brojo Nath Ganguly and Another
Apartment Buyers Agreement – Cancellation of allotment – To justify forfeiture of advance money being part of “earnest money” terms of contract should be clear and explicit – Agreement is one-sided a....
Shop Buyer’s Agreement – Only a ‘reasonable amount’ can be forfeited as earnest money – Any amount exceeding 10% of total sale price cannot be forfeited by Builder.
(1) Consumer Protection Act and RERA Act neither exclude nor contradict each other – They are concurrent remedies operating independently and without primacy.(2) For interest payable on amount deposi....
Commercial Space - commercial purpose does not include if it is for the purpose of earning his livelihood by means of self-employment.
“Since the possession of subject flats were not delivered within the stipulated time, allottee held entitled for refund of amount deposited with interest.”
Earnest Money Clause – Earnest Money Clause in the Agreement being wholly one-sided and unjustified constitutes an unfair trade practice and therefore, is not binding upon the Complainant.
(1) Purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction – purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction, the value of services hired or availed plus compensation shall be the value for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction.
(1) Remedies - The remedies under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 are in addition to the remedies available under special statutes.(2) Refund of Money - Buyer cannot be made to wait indefinitely fo....
(1) Delay in obtained permits cannot be claimed as Force Majeure defense(2) Unjust agreement in favor of builder cannot be upheld(3) COVID-19 can be claimed as a Force Majeure defense
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.