SURYA KANT, N. KOTISWAR SINGH
Sunil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bihar Legislative Council (Through Secretary) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURYA KANT, J.
1. The Petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, laying challenge to Report No. 12024 dated 14.06.2024 (Impugned Report), submitted by the Ethics Committee of the Bihar Legislative Council (BLC) recommending his expulsion as a Member of Legislative Council (MLC). The consequential notification dated 26.07.2024 relieving the Petitioner from the membership of the BLC issued by the BLC’s Secretariat (Impugned Notification), is also assailed.
A. FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The present controversy arises from allegations of unparliamentary conduct by the Petitioner, including the use of derogatory expressions in his capacity as an MLC within the House of the BLC. This conduct of the Petitioner prompted the initiation of proceedings against him by the Ethics Committee. The allegations were found to be substantiated, leading the Ethics Committee to recommend the Petitioner’s expulsion from the BLC. Subsequently, a resolution to that effect was passed by a majority of the members of BLC, formalising the decision to expel and relieve the Petitioner. The facts giving rise to the present petition are set out hereinbel
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India; (1978) 1 SCC 248 [Para 43]
Ashish Shelar and Ors. v. Maharashtra Legislative Assembly and Anr.
Dev Singh v. Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & Anr. ; (2003) 8 SCC 9 [Para 30]
LIC of India v. R. Dhandapani; (2006) 13 SCC 613 [Para 30]
Kulja Industries Ltd. v. Chief General Manager
Vice-Chairman and Managing Director
Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. v. U.T.
Modern Dental College & Research Centre & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Ors.; (2016) 7 SCC 353 [Para 34]
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India & Ors.; (2020) 3 SCC 637 [Para 36]
Association for Democratic Reforms & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 150 [Para 36]
Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India; (2020) 10 SCC 274 [Para 37]
Shivu & Anr. v. Registrar General
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab; (1982) 3 SCC 24 [Para 40]
Lehna v. State of Haryana; (2002) 3 SCC 76 [Para 40]
Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau & Ors.; 2024 INSC 479 [Para 41]
Munish Bhasin and Ors v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.; (2009) 4 SCC 45 [Para 41]
Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.; 2022 SCC OnLine SC 897 [Para 41]
Parvez Noordin Lokhandwalla v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.; (2020) 10 SCC 77. [Para 41]
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar & Anr.; (2014) 8 SCC 273 [Para 44]
Raja Ram Pal v. The Hon’ble Speaker of Lok Sabha & Ors.; (2007) 3 SCC 184 [Para 57]
Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India & Ors.; (1987) 4 SCC 611 [Para 75]
B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India and Ors.; 1995 (6) SCC 749 [Para 81]
The expulsion of a member from the legislature must be proportionate to the misconduct, and actions infringing fundamental rights are subject to judicial review.
(1) Suspension of BJP MLAs from Maharashtra Legislative Assembly – Suspension of a member must be preferred as a short-term or a temporary measure – Impugned resolution suffers from vice of being unc....
The power of suspension of legislative members extends beyond Assembly grounds, and procedural adherence to natural justice does not nullify Assembly decisions unless serious prejudice exists.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.