SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 568

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN, JJ.
Jomon K.K. – Appellant
Versus
Shajimon P. & Ors. Etc. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. of 2025 [Arising Out Of SLP (C) Nos.7930-7931 of 2020]
Decided on : 02-04-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. P. N Ravindran, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. Ms. Anne Mathew, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Mr. Jai Govind M J, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K., Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Mr. Mohd Aman Alam, Adv. Mr. Aditya Narendranath, Adv.

Statutory qualifications for public employment must be strictly adhered to, and higher qualifications do not confer eligibility if specific requirements are not met.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Public Service Commission Act, 1958 - Special Rules for Kerala State Water Transport Subordinate Service, 1975 - Eligibility criteria for appointment as Boat Lascar - The appellant, holding a Syrang’s licence, was deemed ineligible for the post of Lascar due to the requirement of a current Lascar’s licence as per the advertisement and Special Rules. The Tribunal's order to recast the Ranked List was upheld by the High Court, leading to the cancellation of the appellant's appointment. (Paras 1, 12, 21, 30)

(B) Administrative Law - Non-joinder of necessary parties - The appellant was not impleaded in the original applications challenging the Ranked List, which was a procedural defect affecting the Tribunal's order against him. (Paras 15, 19)

Facts of the case:
The appellant applied for the post of Boat Lascar, believing his Syrang’s licence qualified him, but was later informed of his ineligibility due to not possessing a current Lascar’s licence, leading to the cancellation of his appointment. (Paras 2, 6, 30)

Findings of Court:
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that only candidates with a current Lascar’s licence were eligible for the post, reinforcing the statutory requirement. (Paras 30, 41)

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant's Syrang’s licence qualified him for the Lascar position despite the explicit requirement for a current Lascar’s licence. (Paras 12, 21)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that statutory qualifications must be strictly adhered to, and the absence of a current Lascar’s licence rendered the appellant ineligible, regardless of his higher qualifications. (Paras 21, 30)

Result: Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

THE APPEAL

1. These appeals, by special leave, take exception to the common judgment and order dated 2nd December, 2019 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissing the appellant's writ petitions1[O.P.(KAT) No. 153 of 2019 and O.P.(KAT) No. 154 of 2019].

FACTS

2. Facts giving rise to these appeals, which are not in dispute, are these:

    a. An advertisement dated 17th October, 2012 was published by the Secretary of Kerala Public Service Commission2[KPSC] inviting applications from interested candidates for filling up 12 vacant posts of “Boat Lascar” under the Kerala State Water Transport Department3[the department]. The method of appointment was indicated as ‘direct recruitment’ and the qualifications stipulated therein read as follows:

    7. Qualifications:

    (1) Literacy in Malayalam or Tamil or Kannada

    (2) Possession of Current Lascar's Licence

    Note :- Candidates should possess current Lascar's Licence on the last date for receipt of applications, during Practical Test and Interview also.

    b. Incidentally, in terms of the Special Rules of 19754[the Special Rules] for the Kerala State Water Transport Subordinate Service (Operating Wing) 5[Subordinate Service], the service would consist of 3 classes of officers. While Class I comprised 2 categories, Classes II and III comprised 3 categories, viz. Category 1, Category 2 and Category 3. Syrang, Driver and Lascar are listed at Categories 1, 2 and 3, respectively, of Class III. In terms of the Schedule appended to the Special Rules, the post of Syrang can be filled up either by direct recruitment or by promotion from among Lascars in the ratio of 1:1 whereas appointment on the post of Lascar is entirely by direct recruitment. It is also provided in the Schedule that while literacy in Malayalam or Tamil or Kannada is the common qualification required for appointment as Syrang as well as Lascar, an individual aspiring for the post of Syrang must possess current Syrang’s licence while an individual aspiring for appointment on the post of Lascar is similarly required to possess a current Lascar’s Licence.

    c. The licence noted above is a certificate of competency that is referred to in Chapter III of the Kerala Inland Vessels Rules, 2010. In terms thereof, any aspiring individual fulfilling the qualifications statutorily prescribed is issued a certificate of competency upon succeeding in the “viva voce examination” that is conducted either for a Syrang’s licence or a Lascar’s licence. Inter alia, while a person aspiring for a Syrang’s licence is required to be 10th standard pass, it is 8th standard pass for anyone aspiring for a Lascar’s licence.

    d. By a letter dated 9th October, 2012 addressed to the Director of the Department, the Director of Ports6[the Director] conveyed to the following effect:

    This is to communicate formally that the Syrang, Master and Driver Certificate issued by the Chief Examiner under the KIV Rules 2010 is a certificate superior to Lascar Certificate. Hence those who possess Syrang, Master and Driver Certificate will be proficient in Lascar work also. Thus Syrang and Master Certificate can be considered more than equivalent to Lascar Certificate and such persons are eligible for the job 'lacer' (sic, lascar) also.

    This communication is issued based on the representation received from a few candidates who applied to the Public Service Commission for Lascar job in order to enable them to complete the application process. Copy of their representation is enclosed. However the final selection may be done based on practical test, on the skills required, type of vessel and other requirements of the organization.

    e. The appellant was the holder of a Syrang’s licence, which was valid when he noticed the advertisement.

    f. Perceiving that possession of a Syrang’s licence makes him eligible to apply for the post of Lascar which, incidentally, happens to be the feeder post for promotion to the post of Syrang, the appellant offered his candidature and acquitte

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top