SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ.
Prabhjot Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab And Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No(s). 5132 of 2025 [@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(s). 17747 of 2023]
Decided On : 09-04-2025
Service Law – Reservation – Recruitment process commences from issuance of advertisement calling for applications and ends with filling up of vacancies – Eligibility criteria for being placed in select list, notified at commencement of recruitment process, cannot be changed midway through recruitment process unless extant Rules so permit, or advertisement, which is not contrary to extant Rules, so permit – Appellant was only SC woman candidate who successfully cleared all tests for post of DSP – Appellant must be accepted as only person qualified in her category who could be appointed – Impugned order passed by Division Bench set aside, by upholding Order of Single Judge. (Paras 22, 23, 24 and 25)
Facts of the case:
By way of present appeal, appellant challenges an order of Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh passed on 18.07.2023. Appeal involves question of reservations of posts in government services of State of Punjab; including reservation for women.
Findings of Court:
DSP SC Sports was reserved for women. This was mentioned in advertisement dated 11.12.2020. This advertisement or the 2020 Rules were never challenged. Respondents now cannot cry foul referring to an event post 11.12.2020 where so-called roster system came into existence. We have not even considered the need to examine legality of this roster in principle.
Result : Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. By way of the present appeal, the appellant challenges an order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh passed on 18.07.2023.
3. This appeal involves the question of reservations of posts in the government services of the State of Punjab; including reservation for women. It is necessary here to elaborate upon some essential facts of this case in order to better appreciate the controversy before us. These facts are as follows:
b. In this advertisement, which is advertisement no.08, some seats were reserved for members of the SC community. For our purposes, it is relevant that a total of two vacancies were advertised for ‘Scheduled Caste Sports’-one for DSP and the other for Deputy Superintendent (Jails)/District Probation Officer (‘DSJ/DPO’).
c. Respondent no. 5 herein (‘private respondent’) applied in the ‘Scheduled Caste Sports’ category on 09.06.2020. Appellant too had applied as SC Sports candidate.
d. Meanwhile, on 21.10.2020, the Punjab Civil Services (Reservation of Posts for Women) Rules, 2020 (‘2020 Rules’)were made and notified.
e. These Rules are applicable to all posts to be filled by direct recruitment in all government establishments in Groups A, B, C, D services, and importantly it provided for 33% reservation for women in all posts. Under the 2020 Rules, this reservation is to be horizontal and compartmentalized, which means reservation within each category of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes, Other Backward Classes, Economically Weaker Sections, and Open Category. Sub-rule 5 of the 2020 Rules provides for the procedure for reservation of posts.
f. In light of the notification of the 2020 Rules, the State government withdrew its requisition dated 17.04.2020, on which was based the advertisement no.08 dated 04.06.2020, which was issued by the Public Service Commission. The reason being that now a fresh requisition would have to be now issued in compliance with the 2020 Rules, which mandated 33% reservation for women. As a result, on 08.12.2020, the State government wrote to the Public Service Commission asking for the withdrawal of advertisement no.08 dated 04.06.2020 (a public notice with respect to withdrawal of the advertisement no.08 was issued by the Public Service Commission on the very next day i.e. 09.12.2020).
g. On 11.12.2020, the Public Service Commission issued a new advertisement which is advertisement no.14. However, there was a material difference when it comes to reservations for the ‘SC Sports’ category. This time, only one post for ‘SC Sports’ was available, but this was now for the post of Deputy Superintendent (Jails)/DPO. Thereafter, one DSP post was reserved for ‘SC Sports (Women)’, a category which was created pursuant to the 2020 Rules.
h. It is pertinent to note that in accordance with the decision taken to avoid undue inconvenience to such candidates who had applied earlier under the previous advertisement no.08 (04.06.2020), it was decided that such candidates need not apply afresh under the new advertisement no.14 (11.12.2020), and their earlier applications would be considered.
i. The last date for submitting applications in terms of fresh advertisement no.14 was 30.12.2020.
j. On 29.12.2020, an amendment was made to the 2020 Rules which provided for 33% reservation for women as per the roster syst
Tej Prakash Pathak v. High Court of Rajasthan
Tej Prakash Pathak v. High Court of Rajasthan
Reservation – Eligibility criteria for being placed in select list, notified at commencement of recruitment process, cannot be changed midway through recruitment process unless extant Rules so permit....
The main legal point established is that the de-reservation of posts for sports persons and ex-servicemen should be based on the rules regarding the advertisement and filling of vacancies, and amendm....
no mandamus can be issued by the Court to the State to collect quantifiable data relating to adequacy of representation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in public services.”
Reservation for women in job postings requires adherence to merit, enabling candidates from reserved categories to compete for unreserved positions, based on legal provisions stipulated in the Assam ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court cannot entertain a challenge to the implementation of reservation policies without a challenge to the relevant rules and notificatio....
Candidates securing higher marks than unreserved category cannot claim reservation benefits unless explicitly provided by state policy; constitutional provisions require formal policy to confer reser....
Employment and Service matter - Posts of Junior Engineer (Civil) - SC and ST category - Promotion/resignation/retirement/Selection - It is true that Rule 5(2) of Reservation Rules of 2005 provides th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.