AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, S. V. N. BHATTI
Tosh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature At Allahabad – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, learned counsel for Respondent No.1-Allahabad High Court and Respondent No.3. The State of Uttar Pradesh is unrepresented, despite valid service of notice. We are glossing over the non-appearance in praesenti; however, the State to take note of defaults in appearances to avoid adverse orders that affect public interest.
3. The present appeal is directed against the Final Judgment and Order dated 22.09.2022 in WRIT - A No.13979 of 2022 passed by a learned Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad [2022:AHC:164781-DB] : 2022 Supreme(All) 2029 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Judgment’), whereby the claim raised for appointment by the appellant to the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (of the State of Uttar Pradesh) has been negatived.
FACTUAL SETTING:
4. The appellant, pursuant to the ‘Direct Recruitment to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service-2016’ advertisement dated 10.05.2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘2016 Advertisement’), participated in the said selection process. The f
Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh v L.V.A. Dixitulu
High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan v P.P. Singh
Rajendra Singh Verma v Lieutenant Governor
Dr. P.S. Malik v High Court of Delhi
Ashok Pal Singh v Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Association
High Court of Kerala v Reshma A.
Appointment – A person who is eligible for appointment, cannot be denied appointment without creating a continuing wait list.
(1) Appointments cannot be made over and above clear and anticipated vacancies which have been advertised even though Public Service Commission may have prepared a longer merit list than it was requi....
The denial of recommendation of the petitioner's name, simultaneously with the withdrawal/rejection of the recommendation made in favour of Mr. Rahul Singh, on 19.02.2020, was without any disclosed r....
Appointment – If one of selected candidates joins and then resigns, it gives rise to a fresh vacancy which could not have been filled up without issuing a proper advertisement and following fresh sel....
Rule 7 of the Kerala Judicial Service Rules permits appointments from the merit list approved by the Governor for one year, covering existing and anticipated vacancies, aligning with Supreme Court gu....
Eligibility for judicial service requires continuous practice as an advocate post-application, per Supreme Court's rulings. Selection processes must adhere to stated rules and applicable reservations....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.