Kallu Nat Alias Mayank Kumar Nagar vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, AOR Ms. Ankita Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Shiva Narang, Adv. Mr. Ranveer Singh, Adv.

Table of Content
1. the case involves the murder of victim shivwati. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. judicial notice and cognizance of offences by courts. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 44)
3. arguments about the legitimacy of summoning the petitioner. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court observations on the nature of cognizance and its implications on the trial process. (Para 18)
5. understanding the roles of the magistrate and court of session. (Para 46 , 56 , 60 , 62 , 63)
6. clarification on how cognizance is taken by the sessions court. (Para 70 , 72 , 73 , 78 , 82)
7. commitment of cases involves both responsibility of determination and procedural guidelines. (Para 81 , 84 , 92 , 103)
8. conclusions drawn about the nature of cognizance and the powers of the court of session. (Para 86 , 93 , 102)
9. final orders and directions for trial completion. (Para 104 , 105 , 106 , 107)

JUDGMENT :

For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: -

A.	FACTUAL MATRIX
B.	IMPUGNED ORDER
C.	SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER
D.	ISSUE FOR DETERMINATION
E.	ANALYSIS
i.	What is the import and purport of ‘Cognizance’ under the scheme of the Co