J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Devendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case and complaint details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. discussion on appropriate legal procedures. (Para 6 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments against the registration of fir. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. analysis of section 186 ipc and nature of obstruction. (Para 11 , 14 , 19 , 22 , 29) |
| 5. clarification on the applicability of section 195 cr.p.c. (Para 39 , 47 , 59) |
| 6. final summary and disposal of the petition. (Para 60 , 61) |
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts:
| INDEX | |
| (A) | BRIEF FACTUAL MATRIX |
| (B) | IMPUGNED ORDER |
| (C) | SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER |
| (D) | ANALYSIS |
| (i) Section 186 of the I.P.C. | |
| (ii) Section 195 of the Cr.P.C. | |
| (E) | CONCLUSION |
1. This petition arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 12th September 2024 in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 2047 of 2013 and connected Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 18861 of 2013 by which the writ petition along with the connected application came to be rejected, thereby affirming the order dated 28.11.2018 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate directing regist
Minu Kumari and Another vs. State of Bihar and Others
Umashankar Yadav and Another vs. State of U.P.
Jaswant Singh vs. King Emperor
Janki Prasad Tibrewal vs. The State of Bihar
State vs. Babulal Gaurishanker Misar
Santosh Kumar Jain vs. The State
Collector of Customs and Central Excise vs. Paradip Port Trust
State of U.P. vs. Suresh Chandra Srivastava and Others
State of Karnataka vs. Hemareddy and Another
Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1962 SC 1206 [Para 37
Durgacharan Naik and Others vs. State of Orissa
Govind Mehta vs. The State of Bihar
Patel Laljibhai Somabhai vs. The State of Gujarat
Surjit Singh and Others vs. Balbir Singh
State of Punjab vs. Raj Singh and Another, (1998) 2 SCC 391 [Para 43
K. Vengadachalam vs. K.C. Palanisamy and Others
Iqbal Singh Marwah and Another vs. Meenakshi Marwah and Another, AIR 2005 SC 2119 [Para 43
M.S. Ahlawat vs. State of Haryana and Another
Sachida Nand Singh and Another vs. State of Bihar and Another
(1) Voluntarily obstructing public servant from discharge of his public functions – Section 195(1)(a)(i) of Cr.P.C. bars court from taking cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 172 to 1....
Cognizance of Section 186 IPC requires public servant's written complaint per CrPC Section 195; impermissible to split same-transaction Section 189 prosecution, vitiating entire trial on police repor....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.