Back
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Madhumita Bhainsora – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Dhar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer of cases to competent jurisdiction (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel heard for parties (Para 2) |
| 3. unsuccessful mediation efforts (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. dismissal of transfer petitions (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
1. These petitions have been filed seeking transfer of cases from the courts at Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the court of competent jurisdiction at Vashi, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
3. Vide order dated 21.05.2024, the matters were referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for exploring the possibility of settlement.
4. Mediation Report dated 11.12.2024 indicates that the mediation has remained unsuccessful.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to transfer the cases. The Transfer Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
6. All pending applications stand disposed of.
The court has the discretion to decide on the transfer of proceedings and may direct referral to Mediation for a negotiated settlement.
A transfer petition can be disposed of on the basis of settlement reached during mediation without further adjudication.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
