SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Uttarakhand And Another – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1347 of 2025 (@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1731 of 2024)
Decided on : 18-03-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's familial ties and crime details. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding bail based on medical grounds. (Para 4 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court analysis on serious allegations vs bail. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. order for respondent's surrender and medical treatment. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant herein is father of two children, who are alleged to have been murdered by respondent no.2 herein.
3. Respondent no.2 was arrested in connection with the crime registered vide FIR No.363/2021 dated 15.06.2021 with P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand under Sections 302 , 504 and 506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 ('IPC').
4. Contending that he has delicate health, he approached the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital for grant of bail, inter alia, on medical grounds.
5. By the impugned order dated 06.10.2023, the High Court has considered the Fourth Bail Application No.11/2023 filed by respondent No. 2 herein and has granted bail on medical grounds.
6. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant, who is the informant and father of the deceased children, has filed this appeal.
7. During the pendency of this matter, by order dated 07.01.2025, we had directed respondent No. 1/State to present respondent no.2 before the Medical Board of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi to submit a report within a period of three weeks from that day.
8. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/State has produced a copy of the Report dated 03.02.2025. The Report reads as under -
'No.F.-46-1/2025/MB-Estt.(CNC) Date: 03.02.2025
Sub: - Report of Medial Board for Medical examination of Sh. Rakesh Mishra alias Rakesh Kumar alias Pappu Mishra (UHID No.105762346 and CV No.16020/21) as per the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India order dated 07.01.2025 vide SLP No.1731/2024 titled Ajit Singh Vs. The State of Uttarakhand & Anr reg.
xxx
The meeting of the Medical Board was held under the Chairmanship of Dr. Ambuj Roy, Prof. Deptt. Of Cardiology on 03.02.2025 (Monday) at 11.30 AM I Room 13, Near MS Office, AIIMS, New Delhi.
The following members of the medical board were present in the meeting:
1. Dr. Ambuj Roy Prof. of Cardiology Chairperson
2. Dr. Sanjay Wadhwa Prof. Of PMR Member
3. Dr. Pradeep R. Associate Prof. of CTVS Member
4. Dr. P. Rajashekar AMS, CTC Member
5. Dr. Satyavir Yadav Asso. Prof. of Cardiology Member Secretary
Medical Board Opinion : - Patient (UHID No.105762346 and CV No.16020/21) was examined and relevant investigations were done. The old medical records of AIIMS, Delhi were reviewed, and the following medical condition was confirmed: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dilated Cardiomyopathy with severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF 20-25%) with NYHA functional Class III. This is a chronic progressive medical condition requiring regular treatment and medical follow up. The patient needs to continue follow up from AIIMS, Delhi Cardiology OPD as per previous registration or other tertiary hospital and adhere to medical advice as given from time to time.'
9. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that this is a case where the allegations were made against four persons and the brother of respondent no.2 and two other persons have already been exonerated by the police themselves, inasmuch as no charge-sheet has been filed as against them; and respondent no.2 was arrested and was in jail. However, the benefit of bail has been granted to him solely due to medical reasons. She submitted that having regard to the opinion of the Medical Board, respondent no.2 can be given medical attention for his condition as well as the follow-up treatment as and when required either before AIIMS, New Delhi or in any other suitable hospital. The allegations against respondent no.2 herein are serious. The High Court has lost sight of this fact and also the fact that there have been no condition imposed for the grant of bail on medical grounds to respondent no.2 herein. She fur
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the authority to grant bail on medical grounds, even in cases involving statutory restrictions, if the circumstances warrant suc....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of explicit and unambiguous medical documentation for judicial consideration in bail applications on medical grounds.
Bail – Petitioner is entitled either to file fresh application for bail on projected medical ground.
The seriousness of the offence and the stage of the trial are crucial factors in considering bail on medical grounds.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court must carefully consider relevant aspects and not pass orders for bail and suspension of sentence as a matter of routine, especially ....
While considering an application for bail, all the relevant factors have to be weighed by the Court including the gravity of the offence, the evidence and material which prima facie show the involvem....
Bail on medical and humanitarian grounds – Merely because a person is an undertrial or even a convict, lodged in jail, this facet of right to life cannot be curtailed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.