Ajit Singh vs State Of Uttarakhand - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1598

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 1598

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Advocate, Mr. Ananya Thapliyal, Advocate, Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Advocate, Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Advocate, Mr. Sachin Singh, Advocate and Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Advocate, Dr. Abhishek Atrey, Advocate, Ms. Ishita Bist, Advocate, Ms. Ambika Atrey, Advocate, Ms. Jyoti Verma, Advocate, Mr. Navneet Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Aakash Sirohi, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. appellant's familial ties and crime details. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 8)
2. arguments regarding bail based on medical grounds. (Para 4 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court analysis on serious allegations vs bail. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. order for respondent's surrender and medical treatment. (Para 16)

ORDER :

2. The appellant herein is father of two children, who are alleged to have been murdered by respondent no.2 herein.

4. Contending that he has delicate health, he approached the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital for grant of bail, inter alia, on medical grounds.

6. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant, who is the informant and father of the deceased children, has filed this appeal.

8. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/State has produced a copy of the Report dated 03.02.2025. The Report reads as under -

1. Dr. Ambuj Roy Prof. of Cardiology Chairperson

3. Dr. Pradeep R. Associate Prof. of CTVS Member

5. Dr. Satyavir Yadav Asso. Prof. of Cardiology Member Secretary

9. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that this is a case where the allegations were made against four persons and the brother of respondent no.2 and two other persons have already been exonerate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document