SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1625

ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Colaba Causeway Tourism Hawkers Stall Union – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Table of Content
1. prayers made by the appellant regarding implementation of the 2014 act. (Para 3)
2. high court's obligation to consider the merits of the writ petition. (Para 4 , 5)
3. restoration of the writ petition and interim relief granted. (Para 6 , 8)

ORDER :

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

    "(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, or direction in the form of Mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 3 to take such steps as may be necessary for the effective implementation of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending Act) 2014 Act, and to report compliance of the same within a period of six months, including but not limited of:

    i. Set up/constitute a functional TVC and direct the TVC to do all such acts as are required to be done under the said Act, inter alia of publishing the Charter under Section 26 of the Act, issuing certificates of vending to all eligible hawkers/vendors;

    ii. Frame a scheme in due consultation with the Local Authority and the TVC, in terms of Section 38 of the Act;

    iii. Prepare a Plan to promote the vocation of street vendors, in terms of Section 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top