High Court of Delhi
S. RAVINDRA BHAT & NAJMI WAZIRI, JJ.
Indian Olympic Association
Versus
Union of India
W.P.(C) No. 2310 of 2012 & CM APPL Nos. 4946 & 17545 of 2012
Decided on: 09-05-2014
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
1. The Indian Olympic Association (hereafter IOA) seeks appropriate directions that the National Sports Code, issued by the respondent Union Government (hereafter “UOI”) is beyond its executive power (since Parliament does not possess legislative power to enact a law in that regard) and that its provisions are violative of its (IOA’s) rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1) (c) and 21 of the Constitution of India.
2. IOA is registered under provisions of the Societies Registration Act (“the Societies Act”). It is part of the Olympic movement, and the apex body for all sports bodies and federations in India. It ensures that decisions of the International Olympic Committee (“IOC”) are observed; at the national level it promotes and safeguards the Olympic movement in India in accordance with the Olympic charter (“the Charter”). It also backs and encourages the spread of sports ethics, and fights against doping (drugging) and other obnoxious practices. Some of its objects contained in its Constitution are relied upon; they are extracted below:
“9. To have full and complete jurisdiction over all matters pertaining to the participation of India in the Olympic Games and other Games under the patronage of the IOC as well as the IOA.
10. To participate in the Games of the Olympiad by sending athletes and to constitute, organize and lead its delegation at the Olympic Games and at the regional, continental or world multi-sports competitions patronized by the IOC. It shall also ensure that the members of the delegation shall conduct themselves in a responsible and dignified manner at all such meets.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
11. To undertake with the assistance of National Sports Federations the financing, management, transportation, maintenance and welfare of teams from India taking part in the Olympic Games and other Games under the patronage of the I.O.C. as well as I.O.A.
12. To certify the eligibility of competitors from India for such international competitions as require such certification.”
3. In terms of its objectives IOA acts as the channel of communication between national Sports Federations and the Central Government for financial or other assistance (Clause 14); it has to, in terms of Clause 21 collaborate and help national Sports Federations (NSFs), State Olympic Associations and other sports bodies in the training of the sports administrators for the effective sports information dissemination in India. It is autonomous from the UOI or any State Government, in its functioning, activities or governance. Its members elect its office bearers, in accordance with its Constitution. It is answerable to its members in terms of its Constitution, and to the extent it fosters the Olympic spirit, and involves the athletes and other sports persons who participate in various Olympic games, it is bound by the decisions – and the Charter of the IOC. The IOA repeatedly underlines that it does not receive financial assistance, or any direct financial support from the Government and any other NSFs Federations. Most of the expenditure incurred by IOA is towards travel, boarding and lodging of sports persons, directly or through its agencies like Balmer Lawrie & Co., or the Sports Authority of India (“the Authority”). In fact, the major expense is for the salary of the Officers of SAI. No money given by the UOI for the day to day activities of the Federations/Associations. The petitioners support themselves through individual contribution, annual fee from members or sponsorship.
4. It is submitted that the world of international sports has a hierarchical structure whereby participation of a country’s team in any international event is governed by the concerned International Federation and participation in multidisciplinary events is governed by the IOC. World Level Association/Federation/Bodies exist in every sport, which are affiliated to IOC. At the national level, there is IOA, corresponding to the Internationa
State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley
Synthetics & Chemicals v. State of UP
Board of Trustees, Auyrveda Unani Tibbia College v. State of Delhi
Godfrey Philips India Ltd v. State of Uttar Pradesh
International Tourist Corporation v. State of Haryana, 1981 (2) SCC 318
Damyanti Naranga v. The Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Bijoe Emmanuel & Ors. v. State of Kerala and Ors.
Bhim Singh v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. Union of India
Rahul Mehra & Anr. v. UOI and Ors.
G. Bassi Reddy v. International Crops Research Institute
Federal Bank Ltd. v. Sagar Thomas
Sinha in Zee Telefilms v. Union of India and Others
Union of India v. Shri Harbhajan Singh Dhillon
Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia v. Union of India
Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
All India Bank Employees Association v. National Tribunal
gpt-4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.