SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1783

B. R. GAVAI, K. VINOD CHANDRAN, N. V. ANJARIA
Swacch Association, Nagpur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Anindita Mitra, AOR Mr. Satyajit Sarna, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. Ms. Chitransha Singh Sikarwar, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gagan Sanghi, Adv. Farah Hashmi, Adv. Ms. Salonee Paranjape, Adv. Mr. Karan Bishnoi, Adv. Mrs. A.s Jamuna, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. S. K. Mishra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Yogeeta Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Mr. Sachin Singh, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Pratik Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Puneet Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shreevardhan Dhoot, Adv. Mr. Parth Johri, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Agrahari, Adv. Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gharote Anurag A, AOR Ms. Viddusshi, Adv. Ms. Kalyani Dilip Bhide, Adv. Mr. Varad Kilor, Adv. Mr. Ashmit Raj, Adv. Mr. Rohit Anil Rathi, AOR Ms. Niharika Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashas Rk, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv. Mrs. Vatsala Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, AOR Mr. Krishna Prakash Dubey, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Milind Modi, Adv. Ms. Sonali Jain, Adv. Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR Mr. Hrishikesh S. Chitaley, Adv. Mr. Kaustubh D. Kadasne, Adv.

Table of Content
1. introduction to the case and appellant's background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. appellant's grievances regarding construction and environmental concerns. (Para 3)
3. court's observations on construction approvals and environmental regulations. (Para 4 , 5)
4. extension of public trust doctrine to man-made bodies and environment. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
5. conclusion and final order of the court. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

N.V. ANJARIA, J.

Leave granted.

1.1 Heard learned Senor Advocate Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan for the appellant, learned Solicitor General Mr. Tushar Mehta for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 8, learned Additional Solicitor General Ms. Aishwarya Bhati for respondent Nos.8 and 9, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Shekhar Naphade for respondent No.3, learned Senior Advocate Mr. S.K. Mishra for respondent No.4, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu for respondent No.5, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Rohit Anil Rathi for respondent No.6, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul for the intervenor, along with the respective assisting learned advocates, at length.

2. The appellant-original petitioner addresses challenge to the judgment and order dated 30.11.2023 passed by the D

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top