JUDGMENT

J.K. MAHESHWARI J.

1. After perusal of the judgment and view expressed by esteemed brother Justice K.V. Viswanathan, in the facts of this case, I am not in a position to agree with the reasoning and conclusions as drawn by him, for which detailed reasons supporting my view is in succeeding paragraphs.

2. As per the facts of the case, the controversy in the present case revolves around selection and appointment for the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade­III in Janpad Panchayat Gaurihar, District Chhatarpur in the State of Madhya Pradesh which relates back to the year 1998. The appellants who are ten (10) in number and four (4) other candidates, in total fourteen (14) candidates who were close relatives of the members of selection committee, had been placed in the final selection list of 249 Shiksha Karmi Grade­III. For ready reference the appellants and their relations are described in a tabular form a