Vijay Anand vs Board of Revenue - 2023 Supreme(All) 2328

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2328

JAYANT BANERJI
Vijay Anand – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pradeep Kumar Rai, Prajyot Rai
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Arun Kumar Pandey, Dharm Vir Jaiswal, Harsh Vikram, Mahesh Kumar

Table of Content
1. application for demarcation and prior administrative decisions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments concerning the demarcation process and responsibilities. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court’s evaluation of error correction protocols and jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conclusion and disposal of the writ petition. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Jayant Banerji, J.

Heard Shri Pradeep Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondent nos.1 and 2, Shri D.V. Jaiswal, learned counsel appears for respondent no.3 and 4, and Shri Mahesh Kumar, learned counsel represents the respondent nos.5 to 10.

2. It appears from the writ petition that the petitioners and one Ashish Das filed an application under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 for demarcation of their Plot Nos.450 and 452 situate in Village-Sihara Govind Bahar Chungi (Moradabad), Tehsil and District Moradabad. In the Khatauni that is enclosed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition, the area of Plot No.450 is shown as 1.7520 hectares and area of Plot No.452 is shown as 0.4050 hectares. On the aforesaid application, a report was called for by the Sub-Divisional Officer from