Back
ARAVIND KUMAR, N. V. ANJARIA
Ranjeet Baburao Nimbalkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to administrative notification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments against the legality of kolhapur's designation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. defense of the notification by respondents. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's analysis of statutory provisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. limits of judicial review in administrative decisions. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 6. implications of articles 14 and 21 on access to justice. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 7. confirmation of the legality of the administrative notification. (Para 53) |
| 8. final conclusion of dismissal. (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
ARAVIND KUMAR, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
1. The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution assails an administrative notification issued by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay appointing Kolhapur as a place at which the Judges and Division Courts of the said High Court may sit. The impugned notification, bearing No. P.0108/2025 dated 01.08.2025, has been issued on the administrative side of the High Court in exercise of the power conferred by Sect
The Chief Justice of a High Court has the independent power under Section 51(3) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 to designate additional places for judicial sittings, enhancing access to justic....
The territorial jurisdiction for hearing writ petitions under Article 227 is determined by the location of the original authority, not the appellate authority, as mandated by administrative rules.
A judge must operate within their assigned jurisdiction; any order made outside this scope is void.
The judgment emphasized the need for clarifying the territorial jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 226(2) in relation to challenges against orders passed by the Chairman, CAT, Principal Bench,....
![Tari Hai VS Gauhati High Court [Principal Seat], represented by the Registrar General - 2023 Supreme(Gau) 1213](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Gauhati_3.png)
The Chief Justice possesses broad discretionary powers to transfer cases between judicial benches, and such decisions do not undermine the integrity of any individual bench.
Power of judicial review of an order transferring an Original Application pending before a Bench of Tribunal to another Bench under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 can be judicially ....
Principal Seat retains jurisdiction over writ challenging appellate tribunal order within its territory despite origin in Circuit Bench district; no ouster or mandatory transfer under Rule 3A as appe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
