VIKRAM NATH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Mahesh Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Applications for renewal or re-issue of an ordinary passport after expiry are governed by Section 5 of the Passports Act, requiring the passport authority to grant or refuse by written order after inquiry, subject to other provisions including refusal grounds under Section 6(2). (!) (!) (!)
Section 6(2)(f) mandates refusal if criminal proceedings are pending before a court in India, but this is subject to exemptions under Section 22. (!) (!) (!)
Under GSR 570(E) notified via Section 22, persons with pending proceedings are exempted from the Section 6(2)(f) bar upon obtaining court permission or no objection, provided they furnish an undertaking to appear before the court as required; passport validity is then tied to the court's specified period or defaults (e.g., 1 year if unspecified, renewable in limited cases). (!) (!)
The OM dated 10.10.2019 directs strict application of GSR 570(E), prioritizing court no-objection over adverse reports, and considering orders from multiple courts together; renewal/re-issue equates to fresh issuance under Sections 5-6. (!) (!)
Even without court-specified travel dates, renewal for the normal 10-year period (per Rule 12) is permissible if courts grant no objection for renewal while retaining control via conditions like prior travel permission and passport deposit, addressing Section 6(2)(f)'s purpose of ensuring amenability to justice. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Refusal despite such judicial permissions is unjustified, as it imposes disproportionate restrictions on Article 21 liberty; passport possession distinct from travel, latter regulated by courts under bail conditions or Section 10 (impound/revocation). (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Post-renewal, ordinary 10-year passports remain subject to court orders and Section 10 powers for future impoundment if proceedings evolve or conditions breached. (!) (!) (!) (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. liberty and the right to travel under article 21 (Para 2 , 21) |
| 2. statutory framework governing passport issuance and restrictions (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 16 , 18) |
| 3. judicial discretion in passport matters amid criminal proceedings (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. order for renewal of passport contingent on compliance (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Leave granted.
3. The present appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 04.04.2025 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in APOT No. 215 of 2024, affirming the judgment and order dated 15.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPO No. 352 of 2024. By the said order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant seeking a direction to the respondents, namely the Union of India through the Ministry of External Affairs and the Regional Passport Office, Kolkata (hereinafter “RPO Kolkata”) to renew his ordinary passport which had expired on 28.08.2023. The Division Bench upheld the legal reasoning of the learned Single Judge, but left it open to the appellant to approach the High Court of Delhi and the Court of the Additional Judicial Commissioner XVI-cum-Special Judge, Nati
Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Supreme Court clarified that the right to renew a passport is not absolute when criminal proceedings are pending, as long as judicial permissions are in place to regulate travel, ensuring the bal....
The court clarified that individuals facing criminal proceedings can obtain passport renewals based on trial court permits, without needing a separate order to depart from India, affirming the limita....
Pendency of criminal proceedings bars the re-issuance of a passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967; exceptions are subject to specific court orders.
The denial of passport renewal due to pending criminal proceedings is justified under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967, applicable to all forms of passport issuance.
Ongoing criminal proceedings can bar regular passport issuance under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, while allowing for a short validity passport contingent on court approval.
Pending criminal proceedings can bar the renewal of a passport under the Passports Act, necessitating compliance with statutory provisions and court permissions for validity.
The renewal of a passport must follow the same procedures as a fresh application, particularly regarding pending criminal proceedings, necessitating court permission per the Passports Act.
The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, and passport issuance must consider relevant legal notifications and judicial discretion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.