SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 880

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Rahul Jashnani S/o Late Chander Jashnani - Appellant 
Vs.
Union Of India - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 12514 Of 2025 (GM-PASS)
Decided On : 02-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri Lakshmi Sagar P. N., Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri Shanthi Bhushan H., DSGI

Pending criminal proceedings can bar the renewal of a passport under the Passports Act, necessitating compliance with statutory provisions and court permissions for validity.

Headnote:(A) Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 2(e), 3, 5, 6, 10, and 22 - Writ petition seeking renewal of passport - Court addresses whether pending criminal proceedings prevent passport renewal - Previous judgments imply that pending cases do not bar renewal; however, current ruling requires compliance with statutory provisions - Petitioner denied renewal due to ongoing criminal case. (Paras 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 20)

(B) Judicial precedent - Role of co-ordinate benches - Recent ruling by Supreme Court limits applicability of previous findings; suggests a broader interpretation of statutory provisions applies in renewal cases. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, involved in pending criminal proceedings, sought to renew his passport which was denied based on policy remarks regarding the active case against him.

Findings of Court:
The Court upheld the denial of passport renewal, confirming that the provisions of Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act apply to both the initial issuance and renewal of a passport when criminal proceedings are ongoing.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the existence of pending criminal cases imposes an automatic bar to the renewal of a passport.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court asserted that existing statutory provisions provide authority to deny passport renewal based on the pendency of criminal proceedings; thus, renewal cannot proceed without necessary court permissions as outlined in GSR 570 Notification.

Result: Writ petition disposed; petitioner directed to seek a short validity passport under statutory conditions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's status and passport application. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments from both parties regarding passport issuance. (Para 2 , 4)

RDER :

M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.

The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to renew the petitioner’s passport for a period of 10 years or alternatively issue a No Objection / clearance intimation to the petitioner to travel to Dubai.

2. Heard Sri P.N.Lakshmi Sagar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Shanthi Bhushan H., learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents.

3. The petitioner is a holder of an Indian passport and is presently residing in Dubai for business purpose. He gets embroiled in a crime in which the police filed a charge sheet, which is pending in C.C.No.1149/2022 for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC. The said proceeding is called in question by the petitioner before this Court in Crl.P.No.6024/2023. This Court, by its order dated 25.07.2023, stayed further proceedings before the concerned Court in C.C.No.1149/2022.

4. In the interregnum, the petitioner wanting to get his passport renewed for a period of 10 years, which would be a normal validity passport, submits an application and the same is not taken note of on the score of “a policy remarks”. The policy remarks according to the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India are pendency of criminal case in the aforesaid C.C.No.1149/2022 and would submit that in an identical issue, this Court has answered the issue in the lis in the case of SANTHOSH BEEJADI SRINIVASA VS. UNION OF INDIA , MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, [W.P.No.19203/2021 D.D.04.12.2024]. It reads as follows:

"7. ………..In furtherance thereof, the issue that falls for my consideration is:

“Whether pendency of a criminal case would bar issuance or renewal/re-issuance of a passport to a citizen of this nation?”

8. To consider the aforesaid issue, it would become necessary to notice certain provisions of the Passports Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). The relevant provisions that are germane to be noticed are Sections 2 (e), 3, 5, 6, 7, 10 and 22 of the Act and they read as follows:

2. Definitions.—In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—

… … …

(e) “travel document” means a travel document issued or deemed to have been issued under this Act.

3. Passport or travel document for departure from India.—No person shall depart from, or attempt to depart from, India unless he holds in this behalf a valid passport or travel document.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—

(a) “passport” includes a passport which having been issued by or under the authority of the Government of a foreign country satisfies the conditions prescribed under the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 (34 of 1920), in respect of the class of passports to which it belongs;

(b) “travel document” includes a travel document which having been issued by or under the authority of the Government of a foreign country satisfies the conditions prescribed.

… … …

5. Applications for passports, travel documents, etc., and orders thereon.—(1) An application for the issue of a passport under this Act for visiting such foreign country or countries (not being a named foreign country) as may be specified in the application may be made to the passport authority and shall be accompanied bysuch fee as may be prescribed to meet the expenses incurred on special security paper, printing, lamination and other connected miscellaneous services in issuing passports and other travel documents.

Explanation.—In this section, ‘named foreign country’ means such foreign country as the Central Government may, by rules made under this Act, specify in this behalf.

(1-A) An application for the issue of—

(i) a passport under this Act for visiting a named foreign country; or (ii) a travel document under this Act, for visiting such foreign country or countries (including a named foreign cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top