VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Bhola Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellants in the above-captioned appeals are the employees of the respondent-State. The relevant particulars pertaining to the appellants, necessary for adjudication of the issues arising for consideration herein, may be summarized as follows:
| Sr. No. | Name of lead petitioner | Case No. before Single Judge | Case No. before Division Bench | Special Leave Petition No. |
| 1. | Bhola Nath | WP S No. 2597 of 2023 | LPA No. 390 of 2024 | SLP C No. 30762 of 2024 |
| 2. | Uday Kant Yadav | WP S No. 129 of 2023 | LPA No. 356 of 2024 | SLP C No. 28352 of 2024 |
| 3. | Prakash Kumar | WP S No. 3621 of 2023 | LPA No. 368 of 2024 | SLP C No. 3430 of 2025 |
3. The present appeals are directed against the judgments dated 17th September, 2024, 15th October, 2024 and 2nd December, 2024, passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi1[Hereinafter, referred to as “High Court”] in Letter Patent Appeal Nos. 390 of 2024, 356 of 2024 and 368 of 2024, respect
State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi., (2006) 4 SCC 1 [Paras 6.2
Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Basheshar Nath v. Comm. Income Tax
Central Inland Water Transport Corpn. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
(1) Appeal by Special Leave – Appellant must demonstrate existence of exceptional and special circumstances warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 136 of ....
The State must uphold fair employment practices, ensuring that longstanding contractual employees receive regularization if their roles are recurring and essential to the organization.
The court ruled that long-standing contractual employees performing essential government functions must be regularized, rejecting arguments of irregular initial appointments, thereby enforcing princi....
Long-standing casual workers may be entitled to regularization under policies issued by the State if they meet duration and vacancy requirements, highlighting protection against arbitrary dismissals.
Long-term contractual employees performing essential work are entitled to regularization despite prior undertakings barring such claims, as continuous service establishes the need for employment righ....
The court ruled that employees employed for lengthy periods cannot be denied regularization of service, emphasizing principles of fairness and equality under the Constitution.
Point of law: Service Law - Contractual employment - Regularization of Service - Having applied for appointment to various posts pursuant to a notification of 2019 and being unsuccessful (except one ....
Regularization of employees must consider equitable treatment and the rights of long-serving individuals, given principles of fairness under the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.