Back
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ALOK ARADHE
Registrar Cane Cooperative Societies – Appellant
Versus
Gurdeep Singh Narval (Dead) through LRs. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. question of legal status of cooperative societies post-reorganisation (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural history and administrative actions affecting society status (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding the interpretation of section 103 of the 2002 act (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. understanding the reorganisation act and its implications on cooperative societies (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. amendments to 2002 act in context of constitutional provisions for cooperatives (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. considerations for operational territory of cooperative societies (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. legal fictions under the 2002 act and their limitations (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. final determination on the legal status of the societies (Para 25 , 26) |
| 9. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT :
1. These batch of appeals raise an important question regarding legal status of two Sugarcane Cooperative Societies on bifurcation of erstwhile State of Uttar Pradesh and interplay between Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (Reorganisation Act) and Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 (2002 Act). The core issue is whether Sugarcane Growers Cooperative Societies, Bajpur and Gadarpur, situated in Udham Singh Nagar, District of Utt
Courts must interpret legal fictions strictly, ensuring they do not exceed the legislative intent or conflict with existing statutory frameworks, particularly in cases of state reorganization.
(1) Multi-State cooperative society – Domicile or residence of members is irrelevant for determining whether a society attains status of a multi-State cooperative society – A cooperative society whos....
A cooperative society must demonstrate its multi-state operations to be registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, as per legal requirements and Reserve Bank directives.
The restriction on the number of directors in cooperative societies to 21 under Section 73AAA of the MCS Act is constitutional and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.
The Registrar cannot direct the deletion of a Gram Panchayat from a co-operative society's operational area, affirming multiple PACS can coexist in the same area, promoting autonomy as per the KCS Ac....
Bifurcation of a cooperative housing society is permissible when it serves collective welfare, promotes better administration, and ensures that members' rights and interests are upheld under the Maha....
The Registrar lacks authority to delete areas from existing co-operative societies to facilitate new establishments, emphasizing that PACSs can coexist in the same area under the Karnataka Co-operati....
Legislative amendments to cooperative laws, ensuring deemed membership and equitable treatment among societies, upheld as valid under constitutional provisions, without infringing on court decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
