SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 481

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Rajasthan Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Lavanshu Sankhla – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Siddhartha Jha, AOR Mr. Nikhil Purohit, Adv. Mr. Harpreet Singh Gupta, AOR Mr. Jatin Lalwani, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Adv. Ms. Arzoo Khan, Adv. Mr. Gourav Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satpal, Adv. Mr. Tara Chand Singh, Adv. Mr. Vinay Jaidka, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Prabjeet Sandhu, Adv. Ms. Anu, Adv. Mr. Amit, AOR Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

Question 1?

How to determine the relevant date for eligibility in recruitment—date of application submission or a date prior to interview?

Question 2?

What is the legal effect of press notes that modify eligibility conditions mid-process in a recruitment?

Question 3?

What are the limits of interpreting eligibility provisions to favor or disfavor candidates in public service recruitments?


JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM NATH, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

3. The issue that falls for our consideration is whether the relevant date for acquiring the minimum essential qualification is the date of submission of the application pursuant to the advertisement, or any time prior to the commencement of the interview process.

4. The present appeals have been filed by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer1[Hereinafter, referred to as “appellant-RPSC”.] assailing the common judgment dated 12th August, 2025, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur2[Hereinafter, referred to as “High Court”.] in intra-court appeals3[D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ Nos. 169 of 2025, 130 of 2025, 135 of 2025, 244 of 2025, 279 of 2025, 631 of 2025, 789 of 2025 and 823 of 2025.], whereby the judgment dated 15th January, 2025, passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20295 of 2024 and connected matters4[S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 75 of 2025, 20456 of 2024, 20541 of 2024, 20580 of 2024, 20586 of 2024, 20598 of 2024 and 20611 of 2024.] was affirmed. By the said judgment, the learned Single Ju

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top