SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 56

S.ANANDA REDDY
Darisi Masthanamma – Appellant
Versus
Mandiga Rama Krishna – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS second appeal is at the instance of the second defendant, aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Court of District Judge, Nellore, in A. S. No. 95 of 1988, dated 214-1993 by which the judgment and decree passed by the Court of Principal District Munsif, Nellore, in O. S. No. 819 of 1983, dated 5-9-1988 dismissing (sic decreeing) the suit was confirmed.

( 2 ) THE respondent/plaintiff filed the suit seeking for cancellation of the sale deed dated 26-3-1980 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant as illegal and invalid, and the first defendant has no right or authority to execute such sale deed. According to the respondent/ plaintiff, the suit schedule property belongs to his maternal grandfather Bomma suryanarayana, who purchased the same out of his own money along with some other property and obtained a registered sale deed in the name of his wife Bomma narsamma in the year 1941. Later even during the lifetime of his wife B. Narsamma, who pre-deceased him, executed Ex. A. 2 sale deed dated 20-6-1951 in respect of half of the property, which he purchased under ex. A. 3 sale deed dated 31-12-1941. It was also the case of the plaintiff t





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top