ANIL R.DAVE, RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Campaign for Housing & Tenural Rights (CHATRI) a Regd. Society, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Government of A. P. , rep. By its Secretary, Housing (HB. II) Department, Hyderabad – Respondent
(Per Ramesh Ranganathan, J.)
1. Allotment of Government land, at a nominal price, to recognized political parties for establishing their party offices is in vogue in several States and at the Centre. The Government of India is said to have formulated Policy guidelines dated 13.7.2006 for allotment of its land to recognized political parties for their party offices. In the State of Andhra Pradesh, the Government has been allotting its land to almost all recognized political parties, for locating their party offices, including the Telugu Desam Party, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the Telangana Rashtra Samithi etc.
2. We do not intend examining the larger issue whether allotment/alienation of Government land at nominal value, by way of sale or otherwise, to recognized political parties would fall foul of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as none of the recognised political parties other than the 3rd respondent are arrayed as respondents in this writ petition and the pleadings are wholly insufficient for such an enquiry. We shall, however, examine among other issues the question whether or not land belonging to the A.P. Housing Board, (hereinafter referred to
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Tek Chand Bhatia: AIR 1980 SC 360. (Para 18)
M. Satyanarayana v. State of Karnataka: (1986) 2 SCC 512. (Para 18)
Punjab Produce and Trading Co. Ltd. v. CIT: (1971) 2 SCC 540. (Para 28)
Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products v. Union of India: (2000)1 SCC 426. (Para 28)
Paras Ram v. State of Haryana: (1992) 4 SCC 662. (Para 28)
Nasiruddin v. STAT (10) (1975) 2 SCC 671. (Para 29)
Puran Singh v. State of M.P.: (1965) 2 SCR 853. (Para 30)
A.P State Electricity Board v. Venus Hotel: AIR 1999 A.P 333. (Para 37)
Union of India v. Kuldeep Singh: (2004) 2 SCC 590. (Para 46)
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B.S. Muddappa: (1991) 4 SCC 54. (Para 47)
Chandigarh Administration v. Jagjit Singh: AIR 1995 SC 705. (Para 52)
K.N. Guruswamy v. State of Mysore: AIR 1954 SC 592. (Para 54)
Sang ram Singh v. Election Tribunal
State of Maharashtra v. Prabhu: (1994) 2 SCC 481. (Para 54)
Netai Bag v. State of West Bengal: (2000) 8 SCC 262. (Para 54)
Jayarajbhai Jayantibhai Patel v. Anilbhai Jayantibahi Patel: (2006) 8 SCC 200. (Para 54)
Roshan Deen v. Preetilal: (2002) 1 SCC 100. (Para 55)
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research v. K.G.s. Bhatt: AIR 1989 SC 1972. (Para 55)
State of NCT of Delhi v. Sanjeev: (2005) 5 SCC 181. (Para 57)
Express Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India: (1986) 1 SCC 133. (Para 57)
State of U.P. v. Hindustan Aluminium Corpn.
Durga Prashad v. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports: (1969) 1 SCC 185. (Para 63)
New Delhi Municipal Council v. Pan Singh: (2007) 9 SCC 278. (Para 63)
Dehri Rohtas Light Rly.Co. v. District Board
Dr. Kashinath G. Jalmi v. The Speaker: (1993) 2 SCC 703. (Para 74)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.