C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

1. These writ appeals arise out of common order dt.31.3.2016 in W.P. No.2176 of 2016 and batch. Writ Appeal (SR) No.75322 of 2016 and Writ Appeal Nos.318, 319, 320, 323, 324, 325, 414, 418, 607, 612, 730 and 755 of 2016 are filed by the petitioners in the writ petitions which were dismissed by the learned single Judge on the sole ground that the petitioners need to approach the Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal to establish the relationship of master and servant and the employer and employee and that the remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not an appropriate remedy. Writ Appeal No.437 of 2016 has been filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh feeling aggrieved by the direction issued to it by the learned single Judge to maintain status quo for a period of two months to facilitate the writ petitioners to avail alternative remedy.

2. During the hearing, the learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh submitted that he is not pressing the writ appeal filed by the State since with the expiry of two months period from the