A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Mahmood Bin Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
Government of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Govt. , Revenue Department & Land Acquisition, Telangana, Secretariat – Respondent
1. These two Writ Petitions are being disposed of by this common order as they relate to acquisition of land under the same notification.
2. The petitioners claim that they are the owners of various properties mentioned in the affidavits. The second respondent published a notification on 12.07.2005 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, the Act) in Deccan Chronicle for acquiring a total extent 629.47 square yards of land including the properties of the petitioners for widening of the road from Charminar to Hari Bowli Junction (Reach I) under Charminar to Falaknuma (Charminar Road), situated at Shaher-e-Hyderabad Village, Bahadurpura Mandal of Hyderabad District. The petitioners were asked to submit their objections by issuing appropriate notices under Section 5A of the Act. They submitted their objections. When the petitioners were asked to attend for an award enquiry by issuance of appropriate notices under Sections 9(1), 9(3) and 10 of the Act, without furnishing a copy of the order passed under Section 5A of the Act, they filed W.P.Nos.23367 of 2008 and 9962 of 2006 respectively challenging the order dated 19.12.2005 passed under Section 5A of the
Ramnik Vallabhdas Madhvani v. Taraben Pravinlal Madhvani (2004) 1 SCC 497)
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of T.N (2004) 3 SCC 1)
Hasham Abbas Sayyad v. Usman Abbas Sayyad (2007) 2 SCC 355)
National Institute of Technology v. Niraj Kumar Singh (2007) 2 SCC 481)
Union of India v. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2011) 10 SCC 543)
Surinder Singh Brar v. Union of India (2013) 1 SCC 403)
Laxmi Devi v. State of Bihar (2015) 10 SCC 241).
Kilarapu Satyavati v. District Collector, Kakinada, East Godavari District (2006 (2) ALD 342)
May George v. Special Tahsildar (2010) 13 SCC 98)
M.Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka (2011) 3 SCC 408)
M.Rajender Kumar v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Chandrabhai K. Bhoir v. Krishna Arjun Bhoir (2009) 2 SCC 315 : (2009) 1 SCC (Civ) 512)
Devilal Modi v. STO (AIR 1965 SC 1150)
Daryao v. State of U.P. (AIR 1961 SC 1457 : (1962) 1 SCR 574)
State of Karnataka v. All India Manufacturers Organisation (AIMO) ((2006) 4 SCC 683))
State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain ((1977) 2 SCC 806 : 1977 SCC (L&S) 362)), SCC at p.809
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.