IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI, JJ.
The Government of Andhra Pradesh - Petitioner
Versus
SK. Nooruddin - Respondent
W.P. No. 3596 of 2019
Decided On : 31-01-2023
Employment and Service matter - NMR Mazdoors in the Department of Irrigation and CAD - Scale of pay - 1st petitioner herein vide in G.O.Ms.No.79 I & CAD (Ser.V.2) Department, dated directed the Engineer in Chief (IW) I & CAD Department to allow minimum of time scale of pay i.e., Basic Pay + D.A. without any other benefits to 281 H.R. workers of Telugu Ganga Project as per PRC Scales from prospective date i.e., from date of issue of order with a condition that extension of minimum of time scale sanctioned shall not confer any right of regularization of their services - While so, 3rd petitioner herein vide his letters No , dated addressed to the State Government for payment of minimum of scale of pay to NMRs including the respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein on par with HR workers/NMRs covered by G.O.Ms.No.79 and G.O.Rt.No.575 - However, Government vide Memo No. dated rejected claim of respondent Nos. 1 to 5 herein on ground that they have not completed the required continuous service of five years/ten years as on the cut-off date and further, in those G.Os. - Held, Therefore, there is no teeth in the argument of learned Government Pleader that the respondents 1 to 5 herein came into scheme of G.O.Ms.No. dated for first time and hence they are entitled to only minimum scale of pay - It must be noted that their case was considered by Tribunal on par with similarly situated employees who were benefitted under G.O.Ms.No.79 and G.O.Rt.No. and direction was issued to the Government to extend the same benefit to applicants without showing any discrimination - Court considered view, Tribunal has rightly directed Government to grant basic pay + D.A. attached to the regular posts in same cadre of respondents 1 to 5 herein as per revision of pay scales allowed from time to time as per the aforesaid two G.Os - Court see no illegality or irregularity in order impugned - Writ Petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.
Challenge in this Writ Petition at the instance of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh is to the order dated 31.05.2017 in O.A.No.889 of 2013 passed by Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal allowing the O.A. filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein and directing the petitioner Nos.1 to 3 herein to sanction and pay minimum of scale of pay i.e., Basic Pay + D.A. without any other allowances attached to the regular post similar to the cadre of the respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein as per revised pay-scales allowing from time to time in terms of G.O.Ms.No.79 I & CAD (Ser.V.2) Department, dated 22.05.2009 and G.O.Rt.No.575 I & CAD (Ser.V.1) Department, dated 15.05.2012.
2. The factual matrix of this case is thus :
(b) While so, the 1st petitioner herein vide in G.O.Ms.No.79 I & CAD (Ser.V.2) Department, dated 22.05.2009 directed the Engineer in Chief (IW) I & CAD Department to allow minimum of the time scale of pay i.e., Basic Pay + D.A. without any other benefits to 281 H.R. workers of Telugu Ganga Project as per PRC Scales 2005 from prospective date i.e., from the date of issue of the order with a condition that the extension of minimum of the time scale sanctioned shall not confer any right of regularization of their services.
(c) While so, vide in G.O.Rt.No.575 I & CAD (Ser.V.1) Department, dated 15.05.2012, the Government basing on the recommendations of the 3rd petitioner herein directed to sanction the minimum of time scale of pay + D.A. to three NMRs working in Irrigation Circle, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District who were engaged before the cut-off date i.e., 25.11.1993 and working, on par with the 281 HR workers of Telugu Ganga Project who obtained similar benefit of G.O.Ms.No.79 I & CAD (Ser.V.2) Department, dated 22.05.2009, from the prospective date.
(d) While so, the 3rd petitioner herein vide his letters No.ENC/IW/P&M/EE.III/W2/21180/2005 PF, dated 15.04.2011 and dated 14.05.2012 addressed to the State Government for payment of minimum of scale of pay to NMRs including the respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein on par with the HR workers/NMRs covered by G.O.Ms.No.79 and G.O.Rt.No.575. However, the Government vide Memo No.12002/Ser.V.1/2012-2, I & CAD (Ser.V) Department, dated 25.04.2013 rejected the claim of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 herein on the ground that they have not completed the required continuous service of five years/ten years as on the cut-off date and further, in those G.Os. there is no mention of allowing minimum time scale of pay to the Daily Wage/NMR/Consolidated Pay/Part Time Employees those who have not completed required service of five years as on 25.11.1993. Consequently the 5th Petitioner herein issued the order dated 10.06.2013 rejecting the claim of the respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein.
(e) Hence, respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein filed O.A.No.889 of 2013 before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal. The Government opposed the O.A. The Administrative Tribunal having considered the fact that earlier 281 HR workers of Telugu Ganga Project were extended the benefit of minimum time scale of pay i.e., Basic Pay + D.A. as per G.O.Ms.No.79 I & CAD (Ser.V.2) Department, dated 22.05.2009 and subsequently, in the same lines three NMRs working in Irrigation Circle, Bobbili were extended similar benefit i.e., Basic Pay + D.A. vide G.O.Rt.No.575 I & CAD (Ser.V.1) Department dated 15.05.2012 and that the applicants in O.A. are similarly situated persons and rejection of the Government to extend similar benefi
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Umadevi and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that temporary employees are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale attached to the post without any increments or allowances, based on the princ....
Temporary employees are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale attached to the post, without any increments or allowances, as per the judgments of the Supreme Court.
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing similar duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
Part-time employees are entitled to minimum pay but not to increments or allowances equal to regular staff due to lack of compliance with formal employment rules.
Contractual employees are entitled to minimum time scale pay with annual grade increments at par with regular employees.
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing identical duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
The principle of 'equal pay for equal work' applies to temporary employees, but claims for minimum pay must be explicitly made in the writ petitions.
The court ruled that the failure to include petitioners in the Screening Committee due to administrative delay violated their rights to equal pay under Article 39(d) of the Constitution.
The court affirmed that denying equal pay to similarly situated casual labourers violates constitutional rights, emphasizing the need for timely administrative action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.