Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J
R. Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition has been challenging the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide proceedings Order No.S.4(1)/30584/2021 dated 03.03.2023 and further directing the respondents to grant a minimum time scale of pay of Rs.18,500/- per mensum applying equal pay for equal work under
2. The case of the petitioners is that they were all appointed as Daily Rated Casual Labourers between 2008 and 2019 and the service particulars of the respective petitioners are annexed to the typed set of papers. They are all rendering services under Nominal Muster Roll (NMR) and have continued as such as on date.
3. The Government by a Policy Decision came up with a proposal that in view of their continuous, uninterrupted services which is required in the Irrigation Management under the Water Resources Organization (WRO), issued an order in G.O.Ms.No.233, Public Works Department dated 06.12.2019, arriving at a total of about 3407 such daily rated casual labourers who are working on a temporary basis to be
The court ruled that the failure to include petitioners in the Screening Committee due to administrative delay violated their rights to equal pay under Article 39(d) of the Constitution.
The court affirmed that denying equal pay to similarly situated casual labourers violates constitutional rights, emphasizing the need for timely administrative action.
Equal pay for equal work under Article 39(d) of the Constitution mandates that similarly situated employees must receive the same remuneration, and arbitrary denial violates principles of natural jus....
Recognition of entitlements for long-serving casual workers under employment laws, emphasizing fair treatment and prevention of exploitation by the State.
The court affirmed that casual workers are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale for their roles based on the principle of 'equal pay for equal work', as established in relevant Supreme Court ruli....
Temporary employees performing essential functions are entitled to regularization and minimum pay, emphasizing the responsibility of employers to ensure fair treatment and compliance with legal stand....
Temporary employees performing identical duties to regular workers are entitled to minimum time scale of pay under the principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work.
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing similar duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that temporary employees are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale attached to the post without any increments or allowances, based on the princ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
