SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1255

RAVI NATH TILHARI
V. Nagalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.Jyothi Prasad, Advocate, G.Naresh Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri G. Naresh Kumar, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No.2 - Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation. Learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration has accepted notice for respondent No.1.

2. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the Writ Petition is being decided at this stage.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that, in view of the submissions advanced, there is no need to file the counter affidavit.

4. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed for issue of a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 - Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation (in short 'VMC') in issuing notice, dtd. 9/12/2022, vide Rc.N4-145138/2015, directing the petitioner to vacate the leased premises i.e., Woodpeta Community Hall, Moghalrajpuram, Vijayawada, in which the petitioner is running Sairam Garments and Tailors, as illegal and arbitrary, as also to set aside the said notice.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top