SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 926

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Eede Jayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.P.Raju, Advocate

JUDGMENT

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J. - This Habeas Corpus petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for release of her husband Eede Naga Raju, S/o Subrahmanyam, resident of Uppalameta, Jagareddygudem (M), West Godavari District who was detained as per the Detention order in Roc.No.C1/e-1882535/2022 dtd. 26/3/2022 passed by 2nd respondent under Sec. 3(2) r/w 3(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 (1 of 1986) [for short, the Act 1 of 1986] and later confirmed by the 1st respondent as per the proceedings in G.O.Rt.No.913, dtd. 18/5/2022.

2. The detention order dtd. 26/3/2022 was passed by 2nd respondent on the ground that the detenue was involved in following four cases and thus he is a Bootlegger within the meaning of Sec. 2(b) of the Act 1 of 1986 and his activities are prejudicial to the maintenance of public health and public order.

3. The detention order is challenged in this writ petition on the grounds that the detenue was on bail in all the crimes which fact was not taken into consideration while detaining him and furt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top