SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1203

NINALA JAYASURYA
C. Yashoda – Appellant
Versus
U. Sudheera – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N. Ranga Reddy, Advocate, for the Appellant; Srinivas Basava, Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Ninala Jayasurya, J. - The present Revision Petition is preferred against an Order passed in I.A. No. 210 of 2019 in A.S. No. 17 of 2016 dated 01.12.2021 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

2. Heard Mr. N. Ranga Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Srinivas Basava, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

3. The petitioner herein is respondent No. 1 in the above referred I.A. The respondents herein filed the said I.A., under Section 5 of the Limitation Act (for short 'the Act') and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'C.P.C.'), seeking to condone the delay of 430 days in presenting the application for setting aside abatement of the appeal against the 5th appellant which occurred due to non-impleadment of the legal heirs of deceased-5th appellant. The petitioner/1st respondent filed her counter opposing the said application. The learned Appellate Court after considering the matter condoned the delay and allowed the petition on payment of costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the petitioner herein. Aggrieved by the said Orders, the present Revision Petition came to be field.

4. Learned counsel f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top