SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 601

V. SRINIVAS
Scl Infratech Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
V. R. Constructions – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Srinivasa Rao Bodduluri, Advocate, Arun Showri G., Advocate

JUDGMENT

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU, J. - This appeal is filed questioning the judgment and decree dtd. 8/12/2017 passed in O.S.No.83 of 2017 by the Commercial Court-cum-Principal District Judge, Kurnool.

2. Sri B.Adinarayana Rao, learned senior counsel appeared for the appellant, whereas Sri N.Subba Rao, learned senior counsel appeared for the respondents.

3. Learned senior counsel for the appellant essentially argued that the judgment of the lower Court is against the settled principles of law. He points out that in the contract between the appellant and the 1st respondent, there is no condition for payment of escalation charges. In the parent contract between the appellant and the State, there is an escalation clause which is not, however, included in the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant No.1. It is also pointed out that the pleading about the escalation in the suit is absolutely lacking and that the trial Judge committed an error in awarding escalation. It is, according to him, a matter of contract and the Court cannot award escalation on the grounds of equity or otherwise. He also points out that the claim made is essentially for alleged balance due, whereas escalation was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top