IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA, J.
M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Divisional Manager – Appellant
Versus
Dasari Nageswaramma, W/o. Dasari Bodappa and Ors. – Respondents
M.A.C.M.A. No. 1979 of 2008
Decided On : 15-06-2023
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation for Death - Sections 173, 337, 338, 304-A IPC - Yashpal Luthra & Another Vs. United India Insurance Co., Ltd. & Another, 2012(2) TN MAC 625 Del = 2009 SCC Online Del 4291 - Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Surendra Nath Loomba & Others, 2012 (13) SCC 792 - National Insurance Company Vs. Pranay Sethi, 2017 ACJ 2700 (SC) - Ramachandrappa Vs. Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, (2011) 13 SCC 236 - Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 ACJ 1298 (SC) - Magma General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and others, 2018 ACJ 2782 (SC)
Fact of the Case:
The appeal challenges an award granting compensation to the claimants for the death of the deceased in a road traffic accident. The deceased sustained head injury as a pillion rider in a motorcycle accident and later succumbed to injuries. The Insurance Company contested the liability to pay compensation.
Finding of the Court:
The Tribunal's findings on the rash and negligent driving of the motorcycle rider and the liability of the Insurance Company were upheld. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal was found to be unjustified and was enhanced based on legal principles established by various court judgments.
Issues: 1. Liability of the Insurance Company under Comprehensive/Package Policy for the death of a pillion rider. 2. Justifiability of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi: The Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation for the death of a pillion rider under the Comprehensive/Package Policy. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal was not in accordance with legal principles established by court judgments and was enhanced based on the deceased's monthly earnings and loss of dependency.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the compensation amount was enhanced from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.9,18,000 along with interest. The respondents 2 & 3 were directed to deposit the compensation amount within two months failing which execution can be taken out against them. The claimants were directed to pay the requisite Court-fee in respect of the enhanced amount awarded over and above the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short “the Act”), is preferred by the appellant- M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited, challenging Award dated 10.03.2008 delivered by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge (FTC), Anantapur, (for short “the Tribunal”) in O.P.No.397 of 2006 granting compensation to the petitioners/claimants, on account of the death of the deceased-Dasari Bodappa, as prayed in the petition (Rs.2,00,000/-) with costs and interest @ 7.5% per annum thereon from the date of filing of the petition till the date of realization against the respondents 1 to 3 jointly and severally.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to, as they are arrayed before the Tribunal in the claim petition.
3. The factual context of the case, is as under:
(b) The matter was reported to the Police alleging that the accident took place as a result of rash and negligent driving of the rider of the motorcycle bearing No.AP 02 L 3356. Based on the complaint lodged by the complainant-Siva Sankar, a case in Crime No.84 of 2004 was registered by Bathelapalli Police against the accused (respondent No.1 in the O.P.) for the offences punishable under Sections 337 and 338 IPC. After investigation of the case, a charge sheet was submitted before the learned Judicial magistrate of First Class, Dharmavaram, against the accused, who was the rider of the motorcycle bearing No.AP 02 L 3356, for the offences punishable under Sections 337, 338 and 304-A IPC.
(c) The Petitioners 1 and 2 who are the wives and Petitioners 3 to 7, who are minor children of the deceased filed an application claiming compensation of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- before the Tribunal, on account of the death of the deceased- Dasari Bodappa, in the said road traffic accident.
(d) The 1st & 2nd respondents, who are the driver and owner of the motor cycle bearing No.AP 02 L 3356, did not contest the matter.
(e) The 3rd respondent/Insurance Company, filed a counter contending inter alia that the alleged accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the riders of both the motorcycles and as such, the Insurer/3rd respondent, is not liable to pay the compensation. It is further contended that the deceased was the pillion rider of the vehicle and therefore, the risk of the pillion rider would not cover under the Policy. The Insurer is not liable to pay the compensation and even the c
National Insurance Company Vs. Pranay Sethi
Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Surendra Nath Loomba & Others
Ramachandrappa Vs. Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Magma General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and others
The court established that contributory negligence must be proven, and compensation should be just and adequate, reflecting the actual loss suffered by the claimants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the re-assessment of notional income and enhancement of compensation under various heads to ensure just and reasonable compensation for the claiman....
The court established that a comprehensive insurance policy covers pillion riders and clarified the methods for calculating compensation in motor vehicle accident cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.