JUDGMENT :

RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.

1. Heard Sri Venna Hemanth Kumar, learned Central Government Counsel for the petitioners and Sri K.R.K.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Union of India and its Authorities challenging the Judgment and Order dated 01.12.2017 passed in O. A. No. 1439 of 2012 by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short “The Tribunal”), Hyderabad with the prayer to quash the same.

3. The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as under:

“…to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction in the nature of the Writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records relating to and connected with the order dated 01.12.2017 rendered in O.A.No. 1439 of 2012 on the file of the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench Hyderabad quash and set aside the same as it is contrary to law and pass……”

4. The respondent, Sri B.S.Purushotham, while working as Ticket Examiner in Guntakal Division was issued the Charge Memora