Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Yeduru Simhachalam, S/o. Late Sydu – Appellant
Versus
Yeduru Demudu, S/o. Late Sydu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. None appeared on either side.
2. Even though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It seems that the appellants are not inclined to prosecute the appeal.
3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by appearing for the hearing may lead to dismissal of the appeal suit.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution due to appellant's counsel absence.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Non-prosecution due to lack of representation can lead to dismissal of an appeal.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to appellant's failure to appear.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
