SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 264

BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
Suriseettimanika – Appellant
Versus
Surisetti Vidhya Sagar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Ms.T.V.Sridevi as well as learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr.Raja Reddy, Koneti.

2. This Transfer Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner under Sec. 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code (in short, 'Cr.P.C'), seeking transfer of SC No.27 of 2021 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge's Court at Amalapuram to Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Visakhapatnam or to any other competent Court at Visakhapatnam.

3. The case of the petitioner in brief, is that her marriage with the 1st respondent solemnized on 24/5/2014 in a hotel at Visakhapatnam, and at that time her parents gave a dowry to the 1st respondent. The petitioner submits that the 1st respondent used to take all her earnings while she was working at Vijeta Hospital, Visakhapatnam and then in the month of March, 2018 the respondent Nos.1 to 3 have demanded additional dowry of Rs.20, 00, 000.00 from her parents', which they could not fulfil. Then, the 1st respondent got employment at Area Hospital, Amalapuram, where he worked for few days and started harassing her to sell the flat at Kommadi of Visakhapatnam. It is also the contention of the petitioner th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top