IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Gias Uddin Ahmed, S/o Late Reaz Uddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
Tr.P.(Crl.) No. 25 of 2022
Decided on : 09-10-2023
Domestic Violence Act – Section 27 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 407 – Immense physical and mental harassment – Petition for transferring Misc.(DV) Case – Held learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2 had filed one resignation letter which is annexed with affidavit-in-opposition as Annexure-A1 that she has resigned from post, yet, from her deposition dated shows that she has been working in a private organization and staying – It appears that respondent No.2 is staying and her daughter has also been pursuing studies – Court is of view that petitioners have succeeded in making out a case for transferring Misc.(DV) Case No pending in Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, , which appears to have been filed only to harass petitioners – Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. M.J. Quadir, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent No.1.
2. This petition, under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is preferred by four petitioners, namely, Gias Uddin Ahmed, Begum Firoza Ahmed, Semim Imtiaz Ahmed and Rojee Begum @ Roji Begum, for transferring the Misc.(DV) Case No.03/2022 filed by the respondent No.2 against the petitioners and the respondent No.3, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur, to the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M), Guwahati. It is to be noted here that the Misc.(DV) Case No.03/2022, is filed by the respondent No.2 against the petitioners and also against the respondent No.3.
THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND:-
3. The background facts leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:-
4. The petitioners case is that the allegation made in the said domestic violence case is false and that the respondent No.2 is living in Guwahati and her daughter is also pursuing studies in Guwahati and that she has falsely shown in the case filed before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, North Lakhimpur that she has been residing in her parental abode at North Lakhimpur. Further, the case of the petitioners is that only with a view to harass the petitioners, the respondent No.2 has lodged the case against them and that there are four cases between the respondent No.2 and the petitioners and all of them are pending in the Court at Guwahati and that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are old and ailing persons of 71 years and 70 years, respectively, and the petitioner No.1 is suffering from ailments of heart and they are not in a position to undertake journey from Guwahati to North Lakhimpur on account ill health and therefore, it is contended to transfer the Misc.(DV) Case No.03/2022 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, North Lakhimpur to the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup(M), Guwahati.
5. The respondent No.2 had filed Affidavit-in-Opposition denying the averments made in the transfer petition. It is stated that her permanent address is Bharalumukh as she married to respondent No.3 and that she was subjected to both physical and mental harassment by the petitioners in the matrimonial home and she was forced to leave the matrimonial home and also to resign from her job in a private Firm where she was working as a Business Development Manager, and thereafter, she left for her parental abode at North Lakhimpur. It is further stated that she had opened one Insurance Policy in the name of her daughter and there it is indicated that she resides at Lakhimpur, and that the Protection Officer had also prepared one Domestic Incidence Report wherein also her present address is indicated as Lakhimpur. Therefore, it is contended to dismiss the petition.
6. It is to be noted here that the petitioners have filed one additional affidavit and brought on record the complaint of Domestic Violence Act bef
Right to a fair and impartial trial, which is guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution of India cannot be exercised by any of party to suit if case is tried by any of courts which is subordinate t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the cautious exercise of power to transfer a trial under Sec. 407 of Cr.P.C, considering the comparative inconvenience and hardships likely to be c....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of CrPC Section 407 (1)(c) for the transfer of a case, emphasizing the ends of justice and the convenience of the parties and wi....
The Court established that the balance of convenience is a critical factor in transferring cases under Section 24 of the CPC, prioritizing the plaintiff's right to choose a suitable forum.
The court emphasized that in domestic violence cases, transfer applications must balance the convenience of both parties, preferentially considering the welfare of the woman, but acknowledging men's ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.