SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1332

RAVI NATH TILHARI, V. SRINIVAS
Ch. Ravi Sankar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.Ramalingeswara Rao, Advocate, V.Ramesh, Advocate, K.R.Srinivas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

V.SRINIVAS, J. - Heard Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner-Applicant, Sri V.Ramesh, learned Government Pleader for Services-IV, for the official respondents and Sri K.R.Srinivas, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent.

2. This Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the order dtd. 25/8/2014 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in O.A.No.50 of 2014.

3. To determine the writ, the shorn of the facts of the case is required.

4. The petitioner while working as Senior Assistant in P.HC., Tharlam, Vizianagaram District, initially, applied for medical leave from 8/11/1995 for one month, due to medical issues, i.e., unable to walk and discharge his duties and undergoing treatment, his wife expired, due to which he went in depression and his treatment continued till 6/1/1999. During all this period of his treatment, he was said to have submitted continuous leave applications to the respondent officials. When he got completely cured, submitted a representation to the 4th respondent requesting for reposting orders by producing his entire medical history. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top