SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 318

K. MANMADHA RAO
Kanigiri Govindh – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: T.D. Pani Kumar.
For the Respondent: T. Vinod Kumar.

ORDER :

1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:

    “.......to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the Orders No. 01/39902/2020/KKD dated 14.09.2020 passed by the 3rd respondent and which was confirmed by orders dated 20.02.2021 by the 2nd respondent is illegal arbitrary violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Circular No. PD/01/2019 dated 01.01.2019 and violation of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same and pas.....”

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was appointed as a contract driver on 11.09.2010 attached to Kakinada depot. Later he was transferred to Ramachandrapuram Depot. His services were regularized w.e.f. 01.09.2014 and attached to Kakinada depot. Since the date of his joining the petitioner discharging his duties with utmost satisfaction of his superiors, without any blemish record. It is stated that on 05.07.2020, the petitioner was in service No. 2591 kakinada to Vijayawada the bus schedule to depart at 16:30 hours. Since less occupancy in the bus OPRS incharge informed the petitioner t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top