K. MANMADHA RAO
Challa Vengal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Executive Officer – Respondent
ORDER:
K. Manmadha Rao, J.
WP No.20490 of 2011 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:
WP No.20491 of 2011 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:
Balwant Singh (dead) v. Jagdish Singh and others (2010) 8 SCC 685
K. Venkaiah v. K. Venkateswara Rao
Lanka Venkateswarlu (D) by L.Rs. v. State of A.P. & Ors. AIR 2011 SC 1199
Maniben Devraj Shah v. Municipal Corporation of Brihan
Mukri Goipal v. Cheppilat Puthanpuraji and other precedents
Om Prakash v. Ahswani Kumar Bassi AIR 2010 SC 3791
Prakash H. Jain v. Marie Fer nandes
R.B. Ramlingam v. R.B.Bhvaneswari
Ram Nath Sao Alias Ram Nath Sahu and others versus Govardhan Sao and others (2002) 3 SCC 195
The court established that the Limitation Act does not apply to appeals under the AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987.
A formal application for condonation of delay is not necessary; oral requests sufficing with sufficient cause are valid in proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act.
A formal application for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act is not mandatory if sufficient cause is shown, allowing courts to exercise discretion in restoring cases.
(1) Law of limitation is founded on public policy – Appeal which is preferred after expiry of limitation is liable to be dismissed.(2) Bar of limitation – Delay is not liable to be condoned merely be....
Application for mutation – Condonation of delay - The term "sufficient cause" is to receive liberal construction to advance substantial justice, when no negligence, inaction or want of bona fide is a....
Though the Courts are required to weigh scale of balance of justice in respect of both the parties, the said principle cannot be given a total good-bye in the name of liberal approach.
The court emphasized that while a liberal approach is generally applied in condoning delays under the Limitation Act, lack of sufficient cause, particularly evident inactivity, precludes such discret....
The court emphasized that sufficient cause must be shown for condoning delay in appeals, advocating a liberal approach while also requiring satisfactory explanations for excessive delays.
The court emphasized that sufficient cause must be shown for condoning delay in appeals, advocating a liberal approach while ensuring timely legal action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.