B. Kumari vs State Of Andhra Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(AP) 434

V. SUJATHA
B. Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pulipati Radhika.
For the Respondents: P. Nagendra Reddy.

ORDER :

(V. Sujatha, J.) :

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking Mandamus, for the following relief :

“…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ by declaring the action of 3rd Respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings no 09/A/2015 dated 12-01-2016 without giving any notice and without conducting any enquiry and opportunity of hearing and contrary to the instructions issued in WA 147 of 2013 is not legal and valid and violation of principles of natural justice consequently set aside the impugned proceedings no.09/A/2015 dated 12-01-2016 issued by the 3rd respondent and pass such other order or orders …”

2. Heard Ms.P.Radhika, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. The petitioner herein has applied for the post of Anganwadi worker for the Badapuram Village, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District. After undergoing due selection process the petitioner was also appointed by the 4th respondent as Anganwadi worker. Challenging the said appointment of the petitioner, the 6th respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document