RAVI NATH TILHARI, HARINATH NUNEPALLY
Foods, Fats and Fertilizers Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J.
1. Heard Sri S. Dwarakanath, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri P. Karthik Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.C.D. Sekhar, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondent.
Facts of the Case:
2. This Tax Revision Case under Section 22 (1) of Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act has been filed by the petitioner-M/s. Foods, Fats and Fertilizers Limited, Tadepalligudem, challenging the Order dated 31.12.2001, passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short ‘Appellate Tribunal’) Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad in T.A. No. 192 of 1997.
3. The petitioner-M/s. Foods, Fats and Fertilizers Limited is a registered company on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Tadepalligudem and dealer in vegetable oil, deoiled cake etc. During the year 1991-92 the petitioner sent consignment of vegetable oils to outside the State and sales through nonresident agents. The assessing authority- Commercial Tax Officer (CTO) vide proceedings in GI No. 539/91-92 (CST), dated 29.02.1996 granted an exemption on a turnover of Rs.1,64,15,660/-. The Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax), in his revised Order dated 18.03.1997 has brought
Aligarh Muslim University v. Mansoor Ali Khan
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
Anil Bajaj v. Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chairman, Board of Mining Examination and Chief Inspector of Mines v. Ramjee
Channabasappa Basappa Happali v. State of Mysore
Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT
Dr. Gurjeewan Garewal v. Dr. Sumitra Dash
Jankinath Sarangi v. State of Orissa
K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India
Kanungo and Co. v. Collerctor of Customs
Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Rajendra Singh v. State of M.P. AIR 1996 SC 2736
Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station v. Ashwani Kumar Dubey
State Bank of Patiala vs. S. K. Sharma
State of Kerala v. K.T. Shaduli Grocery Dealer
State of U.P. vs. Om Prakash Gupta
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Sudhir Kumar Singh
Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala
Surjeet Singh Chhabra v. Union of India
Syndicate Bank vs. Venkatesh Gururao Kurati
The right to cross-examine in tax proceedings is context-dependent, and denial does not constitute a breach of natural justice if sufficient opportunity to contest the findings is provided.
Breach of principles of natural justice and defiance of fundamental principles of judicial procedure falls within exceptions noticed by Supreme Court in the above decision, wherein availability of an....
The principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine witnesses, must be observed in adjudication proceedings under the CGST Act, 2017, rendering any violation void.
The court established that denying a party the right to cross-examine witnesses whose statements are relied upon in a penalty order violates principles of natural justice, rendering the order null.
The principles of natural justice mandate that an affected party must be given a fair opportunity to present its case, and failure to do so renders the decision arbitrary and illegal.
The court established that the provisions of the Customs Act do not guarantee an absolute right to cross-examine witnesses in adjudication proceedings, and the denial of such a right does not inheren....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.