IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
T. Naveen Babu, S/o Ananda Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.30785 of 2022
Decided on : 23-08-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Writ of Mandamus - Petitioners sought extension of minimum time scale on par with regular employees based on the Supreme Court judgment in Jagjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2017 (1) SCC 148 - Court found denial of benefits to petitioners as illegal and arbitrary, violating principles of equal pay for equal work. (Paras 10, 11, 12)
(B) Equal Pay for Equal Work - Court reiterated that temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees are entitled to equal pay, as established in Jagjit Singh's case. (Paras 5, 9)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, appointed as Work Inspectors and Asst Sthapathi, claimed equal pay after 10 years of service, asserting their duties matched those of regular employees. (Paras 2, 3)
Findings of Court:
Court ruled that the respondents' refusal to extend the minimum time scale was arbitrary and violated constitutional rights. (Paras 10, 11)
Issues: Whether petitioners are entitled to minimum time scale on par with regular employees based on their duties and qualifications. (Paras 10, 11)
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the principle of equal pay for equal work applies to temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees. (Paras 5, 9)
Result: Writ Petition allowed; respondents directed to extend minimum time scale to petitioners. (Paras 12, 13)
ORDER :
This writ petition is filled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
2. The facts of the case are that the petitioners No.1 to 3 herein were appointed on 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively on Petty Supervisory charges and they have completed 10 years of service and even their cases are recommended by the Executive Officer of the 3rdrespondent temple for payment of Minimum wages on par with the regular employees vide proceedings in Rc. No.A1/1656/2019 dated 6-12-2019, Rc. No.E1/653/2019 dated 5-7-2019 and Rc. No.A1/1656/2019 dated 17-8-2019 and the same are pending. It is stated that, as on today, the petitioners are paid as follows
| S.No | Name | Cadre | Salary (pP.M) |
| 1 | T. Naveen Babu | Work Inspector (Civil) | 18000/- |
| 2 | M Veeraiah | Work Inspector (Mechanical) | 12000/- |
| 3 | K. Shanmukha Venkatesh | Asst Sthapathi | 16500/ |
It is further stated that the petitioners are eligible for payment on par with the regular employees as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2017 (1) SCC 148 as the petitioners are performing the duties assigned to regular employees, and further, the petitioners possess the required qualification to hold the posts on par with the regular employees. As such, the petitioners are eligible for extension of minimum time scale in the 3rdrespondent on par with the regular employees. Further the work in the temple is perennial in nature as such the petitioners are eligible for payment of equal pay equal work on par with the regular employees. It is further stated that Petitioners services are equal to that of the regular employees, there is no differences between the services rendered by the petitioners with relation to the duties, functions and responsibilities as such, petitioners are eligible for the extension of time scale attached to the respective post as per the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2017(1) SCC 148. It is further stated that in the similar circumstances this Hon'ble Court has granted interim orders in W.P.No.38513 of 2018 and W.P.No.38820 of 2018 to the employees working on P.S. Charges, hence the petitioners stand on the similar footing as such they are entitled for minimum time scale in their respective cadre basing on the Apex court and this Hon'ble Court orders. It is further stated that the petitioners have filed W.P. No.13641 of 2020 before this Hon'ble Court declaring the action of the respondents herein in not extending the 2015 time scale to them in their respective cadre on par with regular employees as per the Judgment of Apex Court reported in 2017(1) SCC 148 and for other reliefs and the said writ petition is pending.
While the matter stood thus, during pending the above writ petition, the 2ndrespondent has issued proceedings in Rc. No.A1/11026(43)/29/2022 dated 1-8-2022 wherein instructions were given to the Executive Officers of major Temple and other 6(a) Temples in the state to revise the minimum time scale of pay of the corresponding scales in P.R.C. 2022 to the N.M.R. Contract / Consolidated employees of their respective temples, who were already extended the benefit minimum time scale of PRC 2015 to pay without allowances, as per the instructions of the Governmen
Temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees are entitled to equal pay, as established by the Supreme Court.
The principle of equal pay for equal work and the entitlement to minimum time scale for employees performing duties similar to regular employees were central to the judgment.
Temporary employees performing identical duties to regular workers are entitled to minimum time scale of pay under the principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that temporary employees are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale attached to the post without any increments or allowances, based on the princ....
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing similar duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
Temporary employees are entitled to minimum pay scale and increments equivalent to regular employees under the principle of equal pay for equal work.
Petitioners are entitled for minimum time scale of pay and they are bound to serve during regular office hours of an employee on par with regular employees of the same cadre. Therefore, the petitione....
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing identical duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.