SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
T. Naveen Babu, S/o Ananda Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.30785 of 2022
Decided on : 23-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri D.V. Sasidhar
For the Respondents: Sri K. Madhava Reddy , SC for Endowments

IMPORTANT POINT
Temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees are entitled to equal pay, as established by the Supreme Court.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, and 21 - Writ of Mandamus - Petitioners sought extension of minimum time scale on par with regular employees based on the Supreme Court judgment in Jagjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2017 (1) SCC 148 - Court found denial of benefits to petitioners as illegal and arbitrary, violating principles of equal pay for equal work. (Paras 10, 11, 12)

(B) Equal Pay for Equal Work - Court reiterated that temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees are entitled to equal pay, as established in Jagjit Singh's case. (Paras 5, 9)

Facts of the case:

Petitioners, appointed as Work Inspectors and Asst Sthapathi, claimed equal pay after 10 years of service, asserting their duties matched those of regular employees. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:

Court ruled that the respondents' refusal to extend the minimum time scale was arbitrary and violated constitutional rights. (Paras 10, 11)

Issues: Whether petitioners are entitled to minimum time scale on par with regular employees based on their duties and qualifications. (Paras 10, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the principle of equal pay for equal work applies to temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees. (Paras 5, 9)

Result: Writ Petition allowed; respondents directed to extend minimum time scale to petitioners. (Paras 12, 13)

ORDER :

This writ petition is filled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

    “…..to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the time scale to the petitioners in their respective cadre on par with the regular employees as per the judgment of Apex Court reported in (2017) 1 SCC 148 and proceedings of the 2 respondent in Rc.No.A1/1102643/29/2022, dated 1.8.2022 as bad, illegal, arbitrary improper, unjust, violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to extend the minimum time scale PRC 2022 to the petitioners and to grant all consequential service and monetary benefits and pass …”

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioners No.1 to 3 herein were appointed on 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively on Petty Supervisory charges and they have completed 10 years of service and even their cases are recommended by the Executive Officer of the 3rdrespondent temple for payment of Minimum wages on par with the regular employees vide proceedings in Rc. No.A1/1656/2019 dated 6-12-2019, Rc. No.E1/653/2019 dated 5-7-2019 and Rc. No.A1/1656/2019 dated 17-8-2019 and the same are pending. It is stated that, as on today, the petitioners are paid as follows

S.No

Name

Cadre

Salary (pP.M)

1

T. Naveen Babu

Work Inspector (Civil)

18000/-

2

M Veeraiah

Work Inspector (Mechanical)

12000/-

3

K. Shanmukha Venkatesh

Asst Sthapathi

16500/

It is further stated that the petitioners are eligible for payment on par with the regular employees as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2017 (1) SCC 148 as the petitioners are performing the duties assigned to regular employees, and further, the petitioners possess the required qualification to hold the posts on par with the regular employees. As such, the petitioners are eligible for extension of minimum time scale in the 3rdrespondent on par with the regular employees. Further the work in the temple is perennial in nature as such the petitioners are eligible for payment of equal pay equal work on par with the regular employees. It is further stated that Petitioners services are equal to that of the regular employees, there is no differences between the services rendered by the petitioners with relation to the duties, functions and responsibilities as such, petitioners are eligible for the extension of time scale attached to the respective post as per the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2017(1) SCC 148. It is further stated that in the similar circumstances this Hon'ble Court has granted interim orders in W.P.No.38513 of 2018 and W.P.No.38820 of 2018 to the employees working on P.S. Charges, hence the petitioners stand on the similar footing as such they are entitled for minimum time scale in their respective cadre basing on the Apex court and this Hon'ble Court orders. It is further stated that the petitioners have filed W.P. No.13641 of 2020 before this Hon'ble Court declaring the action of the respondents herein in not extending the 2015 time scale to them in their respective cadre on par with regular employees as per the Judgment of Apex Court reported in 2017(1) SCC 148 and for other reliefs and the said writ petition is pending.

While the matter stood thus, during pending the above writ petition, the 2ndrespondent has issued proceedings in Rc. No.A1/11026(43)/29/2022 dated 1-8-2022 wherein instructions were given to the Executive Officers of major Temple and other 6(a) Temples in the state to revise the minimum time scale of pay of the corresponding scales in P.R.C. 2022 to the N.M.R. Contract / Consolidated employees of their respective temples, who were already extended the benefit minimum time scale of PRC 2015 to pay without allowances, as per the instructions of the Governmen

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top