Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J
Bolisetti Manikyal Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India for the following relief/s:-
“…to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not granting the petitioners minimum of time scale of pay attached to the post in which they are working along with increments, as revised from time to time as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India as well as the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme court as well as this Hon'ble court and consequently direct the respondents to grant minimum of time scale of pay attached to the post in which they are working along with other and pass such order or orders.…”
2. Heard Sri P.R.K. Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri G.Srinivasula Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.5.
3. All the petitioners were appointed with respondents in various posts i.e., Attender, Electrician, Sweeper, Pump Operator and public health worker, under the control of 5th respondent, and have been discharging their du
Temporary employees are entitled to minimum pay scale and increments equivalent to regular employees under the principle of equal pay for equal work.
Temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees are entitled to equal pay, as established by the Supreme Court.
Temporary employees performing identical duties to regular workers are entitled to minimum time scale of pay under the principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that temporary employees are entitled to the minimum of the pay scale attached to the post without any increments or allowances, based on the princ....
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing similar duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
The principle of equal pay for equal work mandates that employees performing identical duties must receive the same remuneration, regardless of their employment status.
Temporary employees performing similar duties as regular employees are entitled to equal pay under the principle of 'equal pay for equal work'.
The principle of equal pay for equal work and the entitlement to minimum time scale for employees performing duties similar to regular employees were central to the judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
