Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
HARINATH.N
Talari Venu, S/o. Ganesh (Late) – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of possession by petitioner and inheritance (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. counterclaims by respondents regarding title and records (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. assessment of eligibility for relief and proper channels (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. dismissal of the writ petition (Para 11) |
ORDER :
HARINATH.N, J.
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in not taking any steps or action in pursuance to the representation dated 05.05.2025 submitted by the petitioner seeking prevention of the illegal layout which, according to the petitioner, is proposed over land admeasuring Ac.12.60 cents and Ac.8.93 cents in Survey Nos.507 and 508 of Kattamnchi Revenue Village of Chittoor Mandal.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the possessor of the land, having acquired the same by inheritance. It is also stated in the pleadings that the petitioner’s mother was assigned the said land and was in possession and enjoyment thereof. Further, it is stated that after the demise of the petitioner’s mother, the petitioner succeeded as the legal heir of the said property. The petitioner claims that the 12th respondent h
A party seeking judicial intervention in property disputes must substantiate their claims with relevant supporting documents to be considered by the authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
