SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B. KRISHNA MOHAN, J.
Thumu Savitri W/o Ramachandraiah - Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 14284 of 2021
Decided On : 06-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.P.V.N.V. Sastri

The absence of an official award in the petitioner’s name prevents entitlement to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.

Headnote:(A) Land Acquisition Act, 2013 - Section 64 - Writ Petition questioning non-payment of compensation for submerged land under the Polavaram Project - Petitioner claims entitlement citing possession and representations; however, absence from notification and prior award prevents compensation. (Paras 2-6)

(B) The petitioner filed representation post-award; court emphasizes timely claims submissions for consideration of compensation. (Para 6)

(C) The absence of an award in the name of the petitioner necessitates the refusal of compensation at this stage. (Para 6)

Findings of Court:
Petitioner directed to approach the Land Acquisition Officer for seeking relief as per statutory provisions. (Para 7)

Issues: The primary issue revolved around the timely submission of claims and the impact on eligibility for compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: Court ruled that the lack of an award passed in favor of the petitioner precludes compensation claims, emphasizing statutory adherence for claims.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. entitlement to compensation for submerged land (Para 2 , 3)
2. counterargument regarding absence in notification (Para 4)
3. existence of awarded compensation impacts claim (Para 5)
4. late representation affects compensation eligibility (Para 6)
5. petitioner's recourse to land acquisition officer (Para 7 , 8)
ORDER :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in not paying the compensation for the submersible lands of the petitioner under the Polavaram Project with respect to the land in an extent of Ac.2.16 cents in Sy.No.18/a/Khalsa in Thondipaka, Kukunnuru Mandal, West Godavari District in spite of petitioner’s representation dated 21.09.2019.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the resident of Thondipaka Village, Kukunnuru Mandal and the petitioner’s husband had an extent of Ac.2.39 cents in Sy.No.18/a/Khalsa in Thondipaka, Kukunnuru Mandal, West Godavari District. By virtue of the registered will deed No.13 of 2013 dated 27.07.2013, he gave an extent of Ac.0.23 cents to his daughter T.Vijayalakshmi and later on after his demise the remaining Ac.2.16 cents was devolved upon the petitioner who is the wife of the deceased Ramachandraiah. Thus, the petitioner is having possession of the land in an extent of Ac.2.16 cents in Sy. No.18/a/Khalsa in Thondipaka, Kukunnuru Mandal, West Godavari District. While so, the government issued notification under Form No.6A, dated 30.09.2016 under LAND ACQUISITION ACT for Polavaram Project wherein the lands of the petitioner are also included. The subject land was submerged into the Polavaram Project. In spite of several representations from 2017 onwards, the respondents have not considered the payment of any compensation to the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner once again made a representation on 21.09.2019 requesting the authorities to pay compensation, as the neighbors and other farmers in the same survey number were given compensation for their submerged lands.

4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter of the 3rd respondent submits that the Land Acquisition Officer issued notification dated 30.09.2016 under LAND ACQUISITION ACT for Polavaram Project for a total extent of Ac.111.14 gts of Khalsa lands. The name of the petitioner Thumu Savitri W/o Ramachandraiah is not figured in the notification of Khalsa lands. In the draft notification issued by the District Collector, erstwhile West Godavari District, Eluru vide Ref.No.E-131451/2016/R&R dated 05.03.2017, the names of the pattadars/ enjoyers for R.S.No.18 Khalsa were furnished as under:

S. No.R.S. No.Extent Ac. GtsPattadarEnjoyer
1182.39Thumu Savitramma W/o VenkateswraraoThumu Savitramma W/o Venkateswararao
2182.10Thumu Ramachandrayya S/o RoshayyaThumu Satyanarayana S/o Roshayya
3180.19Thumu Ramachandrayya S/o RoshayyaThota Vijaya Lakshmi W/o Ramesh

5. In the draft award passed by the learned District Collector, erstwhile West Godavari District, Eluru for R.S.No.18 for an extent of Ac.2.10 cents the name of Thumu Ramachandrayya S/o Rosayya was recorded as pattadar against Thumu Satyanarayana S/o Rosayya as enjoyer. After scrutiny of the records Thumu Satyanarayana was recorded as awardee for Ac.2.10 gts in R.S.No.18/A/Khalsa of Thondipaka village and the land compensation amount of Rs.24,23,860/- was paid to him. The payment of land compensation amount of Rs.32,04,882/- was paid to Thumu Savitramma W/o Venkateswararao for an extent of Ac.2.39 gts. As regards to an extent of Ac.0.19 gts in R.S.No.18/a/Khalsa of Thondipaka village, the name of Thumu Ramachandrayya S/o Rosayya was recorded as pattadar against Thota Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o Ramesh and the payment of land acquisition for an extent of Ac.0.19 gts could not be paid to either Thumu Ramachandraiah S/o Rosayya or Thota Vijaya Lakshmi W/o Ramesh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top