IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI, MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, JJ.
M/s. S.R.K. Bhailal Bhai J.V. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
COM.C.A.No.6 of 2021 and W.P.No.27807 of 2021
Decided On : 04-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim order compliance and timelines. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. disputes over interim order compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. final directives on deposit and further proceedings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER :
Heard Sri D.Yathindra Dev, learned Special Government Pleader for the appellants in COM.C.A.No.6 of 2021 and Sri C.V.R.Rudra Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri
Ch.Purnachandra Rao, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The interim order dated 15.04.2021, read as under:
“COM.C.A No.6 OF 2021
Admit.
I.A.No.1 of 2021
Heard the learned Advocate General and Sri P.Kamalakar representing Sri Ch.Purnachandrarao, learned counsel for the respondent.
Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Advocate General and the learned counsel for the respondent-decree holder and taking into account the findings recorded by the trial court, there shall be interim stay as prayed for subject to the appellants-petitioners’ depositing half of the decretal amount + costs within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today. On such deposit, the respondent-decree holder is entitled to withdraw the same.
It is also made clear that this arrangement shall be subject to outcome of the Appeal.”
3. Subsequently, application for extension of time was filed, to comply with the interim order dated 15.04.2021 vide I.A.No.2 of 2021, upon which the following order was passed on 24.07.2021:
“I.A.No.2 of 2021
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants and Sri P.Kamalakar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Purnachandra Rao, learned counsel for the respondent.
The present application came to be filed seeking extension of time for complying with the order dated 15.4.2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2021.
As seen from the record, the petitioners were directed to deposit half of the decretal amount together with costs within a period of twelve weeks from the said date.
Though the said period has elapsed, no amount has been deposited. The present application is filed seeking some more time for complying with the said order.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the statement made by Sri Dilip Kumar, learned counsel, four (4) more weeks from today is granted for complying with the above order.
It is made clear that if the said order is not complied with within the stipulated period, the interim order stands vacated automatically without further reference to this Court.”
4. Later on, I.A.No.3 of 2021 was also filed, on which the following order was passed on 17.12.2021:
“I.A.No.3 of 2021
Heard Sri Bala Swamy, learned counsel attached to the office of learned Advocate General and Sri P.Kamlakar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Purnachandra Rao, learned counsel for the respondent.
It appears from the record that already time was extended for compliance of the interim order but till date no amount is paid.
Having to the facts in issue, the appellants shall deposit 50% of the amount directed to be deposited by way of interim order within a period of two (2) weeks from today.
List on 04.01.2022.”
5. The appellants deposited an amount of Rs.3,40,08,615.00 on 19.02.2022. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the said amount was 25% of the principal amount and it was so deposited as under the order dated 17.12.2021, the appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the amount directed to be deposited by way of interim order dated 15.04.2021. The aforesaid contention raised is contrary to the interim order dated 15.04.2021. The appellants had also not filed any application for modification of the said interim order and consequently, the order dated 17.12.2021 could not be considered as direction to deposit 50% of the amount directed to be deposited by way of interim order dated 15.04.2021 and particularly when the order dated 17.12.2021 was passed in I.A.No.3 of 2021 seeking extension of time to deposit the amount under the interim order dated 15.04.2021.
“The Main Com
Compliance with interim orders is essential; failure to comply may result in loss of stay and further execution proceedings.
Non-compliance with conditional stay deposit vacates stay automatically, dismissing petition.
Interest on decreed amounts will not cease upon deposit in a court other than the executing court; actual payment to the decree holder is required to stop interest accrual.
Compliance with court-ordered deposit requirements is crucial, and failure to do so may result in the vacating of any suspended sentence.
Interest ceased to run on the deposited amount after the dismissal of FAO No. 284/2005 on 04.12.2008.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to determine the sufficiency of a deposit in compliance with its directions, and the authority to substitute original direct....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.